Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137, Naples, Italy.
Anim Cogn. 2024 Feb 14;27(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01861-x.
The primary goal of this study was to explore the social buffering effect that humans offer to goats and dogs with limited exposure to human socialization, particularly in situations involving interactions with unfamiliar humans. A total of 13 dogs and 14 goats were selected for the study, all of which had limited prior socialization with humans. Each animal was placed in a testing room with unfamiliar humans for 15 min. Three experimenters aimed to establish a comfortable environment, encouraging social interaction by offering food to the animals and assessing the animals' willingness to accept food and their response to being approached and petted. If both conditions were satisfied, the animals were classified as "social". If one or none of the conditions were met, the animals were classified as "not social". Cortisol levels were measured by collecting blood samples before and after the test. Non-parametric tests together with a GzLM showed that the effect of human social buffering in goats was different in comparison to dogs: goats exhibited higher cortisol levels after the test, while dogs did not show a significant change. Further analysis demonstrated that "social" goats had a lower likelihood of experiencing significant changes in cortisol levels than dogs. Thus, once human interactions are accepted, both species could benefit from social buffering. In summary, this study enhances our understanding of how dogs and goats respond to social interactions with humans in the social buffering effect.
本研究的主要目的是探索人类对社交接触有限的山羊和狗所提供的社会缓冲效应,特别是在与陌生人类互动的情况下。共有 13 只狗和 14 只山羊被选入研究,它们都与人的社交接触有限。每只动物都在一个有陌生人类的测试室中待 15 分钟。三位实验员旨在营造一个舒适的环境,通过向动物提供食物来鼓励社交互动,并评估动物接受食物的意愿以及对接近和抚摸的反应。如果满足了这两个条件,则将动物归类为“社交”。如果只满足了一个条件或都不满足,则将动物归类为“不社交”。在测试前后通过采集血液样本来测量皮质醇水平。非参数检验和广义线性混合模型(GzLM)显示,人类社交缓冲对山羊的影响与狗不同:与狗相比,测试后山羊的皮质醇水平更高;而狗的皮质醇水平没有显著变化。进一步的分析表明,与狗相比,“社交”的山羊皮质醇水平发生显著变化的可能性较低。因此,一旦接受了人类的互动,这两个物种都可以从社会缓冲中受益。总之,本研究增进了我们对狗和山羊在社会缓冲效应中对人类社交互动的反应的理解。