Zhitny Vladislav P, Do Kenny, Kawana Eric, Do Jenifer, Wajda Michael C, Gallegos Jose, Carey Kyle, Yee Geoff, Hollifield Lauren C, Montes Arturo, Walton Edward, Ahmed Shah
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY.
Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 14;36(4):341-5. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000958.
Websites serve as recruitment and educational tools for many fellowship programs, including neuroanesthesiology. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, when interviews, conferences, and institutional visits were moved online, websites have become more important for applicants when deciding on their preferred fellowship program. This study evaluated the content of the websites of neuroanesthesiology fellowship programs.
Neuroanesthesiology fellowship program websites were identified from the websites of the International Council on Perioperative Neuroscience Training and the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care. The content was assessed against 24 predefined criteria.
Fifty-three fellowship programs were identified, of which 42 websites were accessible through a Google search and available for evaluation. The mean number of criteria met by the 42 fellowship websites was 12/24 (50%), with a range of 6 to 18 criteria. None of the evaluated fellowship websites met all 24 predefined criteria; 20 included more than 50% of the criteria, whereas 7 included fewer than 30% of the criteria. Having a functional website, accessibility through a single click from Google, and a detailed description of the fellowship program were the features of most websites. Information about salary and life in the area, concise program summaries, and biographical information of past and current fellows were missing from a majority of websites.
Important information was missing from most of the 42 evaluated neuroanesthesiology fellowship program websites, potentially hindering applicants from making informed choices about their career plans.
网站是许多专科培训项目（包括神经麻醉学）的招聘和教育工具。自新冠疫情以来，面试、会议和机构参观都转移到了线上，网站对于申请人选择心仪的专科培训项目变得更加重要。本研究评估了神经麻醉学专科培训项目网站的内容。
从围手术期神经科学培训国际委员会以及麻醉学与重症监护神经科学学会的网站中识别出神经麻醉学专科培训项目网站。根据24项预定义标准对内容进行评估。
共识别出53个专科培训项目，其中42个网站可通过谷歌搜索访问并可供评估。42个专科培训网站满足的标准平均数量为12/24（50%），范围为6至18项标准。没有一个评估的专科培训网站满足所有24项预定义标准；20个网站满足超过50%的标准，而7个网站满足的标准少于30%。拥有一个功能正常的网站、可通过谷歌一键访问以及对专科培训项目的详细描述是大多数网站的特点。大多数网站缺少有关该地区薪资和生活的信息、简明的项目总结以及过去和现任学员的传记信息。
在42个评估的神经麻醉学专科培训项目网站中，大多数都缺少重要信息，这可能会阻碍申请人对其职业规划做出明智选择。
