The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Department of Urology Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Cnr Hawkesbury Road and, Darcy Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jun;123:108193. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108193. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022226375) aimed to identify the eHealth literacy of men with prostate cancer, and their caregivers.
8 databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web Of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature sources (e.g. Google Scholar) were searched from inception to December 2023. Articles were included if assessing eHealth/digital literacy of men with prostate cancer, or their carers', and health outcome associations. Formats such as case reports, and review papers were excluded. Records and full texts underwent independent screening and data extraction. Author disagreements were resolved by discussion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise included literature, with narrative synthesis of results.
21,581 records were retrieved, with 7 articles satisfying inclusion criteria. A heterogenous field was characterised with lack of modern eHealth literacy measurement tools identified. Results suggest novice eHealth literacy using web 1.0 technologies. Non-validated measures of literacy demonstrate mixed results, while health outcome effects limited in scope and reliability.
Prostate cancer survivors' eHealth literacy levels is likely novice, and requires further investigation.
Digital technologies/resources implemented as part of patient communication practices should be vetted for quality, and tailored to patients' eHealth literacy abilities and/or needs.
本系统评价(PROSPERO 编号:CRD42022226375)旨在确定前列腺癌男性及其照顾者的电子健康素养。
从建库到 2023 年 12 月,我们在 8 个数据库(MEDLINE、SCOPUS、EMBASE、Web Of Science、PsycINFO、ERIC、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL)和灰色文献来源(如 Google Scholar)中进行了检索。如果评估了前列腺癌男性或其照顾者的电子健康/数字素养及其与健康结果的关联,则纳入文章。排除病例报告和综述论文等格式的文章。记录和全文都经过了独立的筛选和数据提取。作者之间的分歧通过讨论解决。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对纳入的文献进行评估,并进行结果的叙述性综合。
共检索到 21581 条记录,其中 7 篇文章符合纳入标准。这是一个异质的领域,缺乏现代电子健康素养测量工具。结果表明,使用网络 1.0 技术的电子健康素养水平较低。未经验证的素养测量方法得出的结果不一致,而健康结果的影响范围和可靠性有限。
前列腺癌幸存者的电子健康素养水平可能较低,需要进一步研究。
作为患者沟通实践一部分的数字技术/资源,应经过质量评估,并根据患者的电子健康素养能力和/或需求进行调整。