Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France; TRINOMA, Villefort, France.
J Biomech. 2024 Feb;164:111989. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111989. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
Closed loop kinematic chain approaches are commonly used to assess scapular kinematics but with heterogeneous ellipsoid calibration procedures. This study aimed to assess whether an ellipsoid surface can model the scapulothoracic sliding plane and determine the optimal number of static poses to calibrate the ellipsoid parameters. An intracortical pin with a rigid cluster of four reflective markers was inserted into the left scapular spine of two healthy males (P1 and P2). They performed arm elevations, internal rotations, ball throwing, hockey shooting, and eating movements. Ellipsoid radii and center location were functionally calibrated for each participant and each movement, either based on all frames of a movement or based on a reduced number of frames (from 3 to 200 equally position-distributed frames). Across both participants and all movements, ellipsoid radii varied up to 10.2 cm, 3.9 cm, and 18.4 cm in the antero-posterior, medio-lateral, and cranio-caudal directions, respectively. When all frames of a movement were considered for calibration, the median scapula-to-ellipsoid distance was, on average, 0.52 mm and 0.38 mm for P1 and P2, respectively. When only five frames were considered for ellipsoid calibration, the scapula-to-ellipsoid median distance slightly increased with 0.57 mm and 0.47 mm for P1 and P2, respectively. To conclude, this study highlights that an ellipsoid surface may effectively be appropriate to model the scapulothoracic sliding plane, especially when the calibration is functional, participant- and movement-specific. Furthermore, the number of poses required for the ellipsoid calibration can be reduced to five, minimizing the experimental cost.
闭环运动链方法常用于评估肩胛骨运动学,但校准的椭球方法存在异质性。本研究旨在评估椭球表面是否能模拟肩胛胸壁滑动面,并确定校准椭球参数所需的最佳静态姿势数量。将带有刚性四个反射标记簇的皮质内销钉插入两名健康男性(P1 和 P2)左侧肩胛骨脊柱。他们进行了手臂抬高、内旋、投球、曲棍球射击和进食运动。为每个参与者和每个运动分别基于所有运动帧或基于较少的运动帧(从 3 到 200 个等距分布的帧)对椭球半径和中心点位置进行功能校准。在两个参与者和所有运动中,椭球半径在前后、内外和上下方向上分别变化了 10.2 厘米、3.9 厘米和 18.4 厘米。当考虑校准所有运动帧时,P1 和 P2 的肩胛骨与椭球的中位数距离分别平均为 0.52 毫米和 0.38 毫米。当仅考虑 5 个帧用于椭球校准时,P1 和 P2 的肩胛骨与椭球的中位数距离分别略有增加到 0.57 毫米和 0.47 毫米。总之,这项研究表明,椭球表面可能是一种有效的方法来模拟肩胛胸壁滑动面,特别是当校准是功能的、参与者和运动特异性时。此外,椭球校准所需的姿势数量可以减少到 5 个,从而最大限度地降低实验成本。