Suppr超能文献

Dravet 综合征药物治疗疗效的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of pharmacological treatments for Dravet syndrome: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 74 Linjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China.

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 74 Linjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Seizure. 2024 Apr;117:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have been developed to treat Dravet syndrome (DS). This network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyse the efficacy of ASMs in DS patients, especially in non-seizure-free patients after treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched. The treatment efficacy was assessed by the percentage reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF) from baseline or individuals who achieved at least a 50 % or 75 % reduction from baseline in convulsive seizure frequency (CSF).

RESULTS

Six randomised controlled trials with 633 participants and seven regimens based on four add-on ASMs-fenfluramine (FFA), stiripentol (STP), cannabidiol (CBD), and soticlestat-were included. All drug regimens were superior to the placebo at achieving at least 50 % and 75 % reductions in CSF, but only STP, 0.4 mg/kg/d FFA (FFA0.4), and 0.7 mg/kg/d FFA (FFA0.7) reduced MCSF. STP (50 mg/kg/d) had the highest correlation with reducing MCSF and achieving at least a 50 % reduction from baseline in CSF, followed by FFA0.4 and FFA0.7. Soticlestat and CBD may also be effective in reducing seizures in DS patients.

CONCLUSION

STP can be recommended as the first choice among the included drug regimens for reducing seizures in DS patients, while FFA0.4 may be considered the second choice. Other drug regimens can be used as alternative treatments. STP, FFA0.4, and FFA0.7 may consistently present favourable efficacy in most DS patients, while other regimens may present prominent inter-individual variability. Appropriate dose selection and intense monitoring are necessary when treating DS using these drugs.

摘要

背景

已经开发出许多抗癫痫药物(ASMs)来治疗 Dravet 综合征(DS)。本网络荟萃分析旨在全面分析 ASMs 在 DS 患者中的疗效,特别是在治疗后未达到无发作的患者中的疗效。

方法

检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和中国国家知识基础设施数据库。通过从基线每月癫痫发作频率(MCSF)的百分比降低或从基线癫痫发作频率降低至少 50%或 75%的个体来评估治疗效果。

结果

纳入了六项随机对照试验,共 633 名参与者,七种基于四种附加 ASMs-芬氟拉明(FFA)、司替戊醇(STP)、大麻二酚(CBD)和索替司他的方案。所有药物方案在实现至少 50%和 75%的 CSF 降低方面均优于安慰剂,但只有 STP、0.4mg/kg/dFFA(FFA0.4)和 0.7mg/kg/dFFA(FFA0.7)降低了 MCSF。STP(50mg/kg/d)与降低 MCSF 和实现 CSF 基线降低至少 50%的相关性最高,其次是 FFA0.4 和 FFA0.7。索替司他和 CBD 也可能对降低 DS 患者的发作有效。

结论

STP 可作为治疗 DS 患者的首选药物方案之一,以降低癫痫发作,而 FFA0.4 可能是第二选择。其他药物方案可作为替代治疗。STP、FFA0.4 和 FFA0.7 可能在大多数 DS 患者中始终具有良好的疗效,而其他方案可能具有明显的个体间变异性。使用这些药物治疗 DS 时,需要选择适当的剂量并进行密切监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验