Schyns Olivier, Beck Florian, Franssen Colette, Tran Gabriel
Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Liège, Belgique.
Anaesthesia and Perioperative Neuroscience Laboratory, GIGA-Consciousness, ULiège, Belgique.
Rev Med Liege. 2024 Feb;79(2):94-98.
We aimed to determine whether sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) had a place as a treatment for headache, as well as its place as an anterior component of scalp block for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Using the keywords «sphenopalatine ganglion», «sphenopalatine ganglion block», «pain», «surgery» and «craniotomy» in PubMed and Google Scholar, we identified 14 relevant articles. The methods used to perform the block and the treatment of control groups differed between studies. The main outcomes studied were reduction in pain scores and hemodynamic variations during supratentorial intracranial surgery. All articles concluded that SPGB was equal or superior compared with other procedures. Although there are still several points to be studied, considering the ease of application, the low number of complications and the results of the studies, the use of SPGB for the headache treatment and in neurosurgery as an anterior component of scalp block seems appropriate.
我们旨在确定蝶腭神经节阻滞(SPGB)是否可作为一种头痛治疗方法,以及其作为幕上颅内手术头皮阻滞的前部成分的地位。通过在PubMed和谷歌学术中使用关键词“蝶腭神经节”、“蝶腭神经节阻滞”、“疼痛”、“手术”和“开颅手术”,我们识别出14篇相关文章。各研究中进行阻滞的方法和对照组的治疗方法有所不同。所研究的主要结局是幕上颅内手术期间疼痛评分的降低和血流动力学变化。所有文章均得出结论,与其他方法相比,SPGB效果相当或更优。尽管仍有几点有待研究,但考虑到其应用简便、并发症数量少以及研究结果,将SPGB用于头痛治疗以及在神经外科手术中作为头皮阻滞的前部成分似乎是合适的。