Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Techniques of Radial Artery Cannulation: A Prospective Randomised Study.

OBJECTIVE

We planned this study to compare three approaches to arterial cannulation, i.e., catheter over the needle, catheter over the guidewire, and ultrasound-guided cannulation, in terms of overall success rate, first pass success rate, time for cannulation and incidence of complications.

METHODS

After obtaining informed written consent from the patient, they were randomized into three groups, based on chits in the box technique, to undergo radial artery cannulation as follows: group N (using catheter over needle technique), group W (using catheter over guidewire technique), group U (radial artery cannulations under ultrasound guidance). We calculated a sample size of 50 patients in each group based on the primary endpoint of the overall success rate. The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test.

RESULTS

There was a non-statistically significant trend towards a higher overall success rate in groups W and U compared to group N (47 and 46, respectively, compared to 43, p-value 0.35). Similarly, no significant differences were observed concerning any of the characteristics of radial artery cannulation, except the first pass success rate, where the success rate was highest in group W (33, 70.21%), followed by group U (34, 68%) with a p-value of 0.04.

CONCLUSION

Though catheter over guidewire and ultrasound-based techniques offer advantages in terms of higher first-pass success rate, they do not significantly increase the overall success rate or reduce the total incidence of complications.