School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2024 Dec;27(1):2316005. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2316005. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve (NOR). Infertile women with NOR who underwent their first IVF cycle were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a freeze-all strategy with delayed embryo transfer (PPOS group, n = 174) and fresh embryo transfer first (GnRH-ant group, n = 174). The primary outcome was the cLBR per aspiration. The cLBR between the PPOS group and GnRH-ant group were comparable (55.75% vs. 52.87%, = 0.591). A premature luteinizing hormone surge was not observed in the PPOS group, while there were six cases (3.45%) in the GnRH-ant group, but no premature ovulation in either of the groups. The pregnancy outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate, were all comparable. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and viable embryos were similar (all > 0.05) between the two groups.
本研究旨在评估孕激素预处理卵巢刺激(PPOS)方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRH-ant)方案在卵巢储备正常(NOR)的不孕妇女体外受精(IVF)周期中的累积活产率(cLBR)。纳入接受首次 IVF 周期的 NOR 不孕妇女进行开放标签随机对照试验。患者被随机 1:1 分配接受冷冻-全部策略延迟胚胎移植(PPOS 组,n=174)和新鲜胚胎移植(GnRH-ant 组,n=174)。主要结局是每次抽吸的 cLBR。PPOS 组和 GnRH-ant 组的 cLBR 无差异(55.75% vs. 52.87%,=0.591)。PPOS 组未观察到黄体生成素过早激增,而 GnRH-ant 组有 6 例(3.45%),但两组均无提前排卵。妊娠结局包括着床率、临床妊娠率和流产率均无差异。此外,两组的取卵数、成熟卵数和可存活胚胎数相似(均>0.05)。