Suppr超能文献

两种物理引导程序治疗小儿喂养障碍的评估。

Evaluation of two physical guidance procedures in the treatment of pediatric feeding disorder.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Mar;57(2):473-489. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1062. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Abstract

Children with pediatric feeding disorder may refuse to consume an adequate variety and/or volume of food to maintain expected growth. They can consume food but may actively or passively refuse, resulting in escape or avoidance of eating. Behavioral interventions like positive reinforcement with escape extinction can increase consumption. However, sometimes these interventions are insufficient, especially in treating passive refusal. In these cases, physical guidance may be used to prompt an open mouth to deposit food. Research indicates open-mouth prompts are effective and rated as acceptable. This study replicated an existing physical guidance procedure, the finger prompt, and compared its efficacy and acceptability with that of a spoon prompt. This study extended research by defining and measuring passive refusal as a dependent variable and assessing social validity among different stakeholders and times. Both prompts were effective in treating food refusal, and caregivers rated the finger prompt as more preferred.

摘要

患有小儿喂养障碍的儿童可能拒绝摄入足够种类和/或数量的食物来维持预期的生长。他们可以进食,但可能主动或被动地拒绝,导致逃避或避免进食。行为干预,如积极强化与逃避消退,可以增加摄入量。然而,有时这些干预措施是不够的,特别是在治疗被动拒绝方面。在这些情况下,可能会使用身体指导来促使孩子张开嘴进食。研究表明,张口提示是有效的,并且被评为可接受的。本研究复制了现有的一种身体指导程序,即手指提示,并将其疗效和可接受性与勺子提示进行了比较。本研究通过定义和测量作为因变量的被动拒绝,并评估不同利益相关者和不同时间的社会有效性,扩展了研究。两种提示都能有效地治疗食物拒绝,而且照顾者认为手指提示更受欢迎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验