• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟对俄罗斯经济制裁、石油价格与第三国能源公司股价之间的动态溢出效应:来自中国和美国的证据。

Dynamic spillover effects between EU economic sanctions against Russia, oil prices, and share prices of energy companies in third countries: evidence from China and the USA.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, China.

CNPC Managers Training Institute, Beijing, 100096, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):19381-19395. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32250-z. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-32250-z
PMID:38358622
Abstract

This study establishes a comprehensive suite of sanction indices and employs the time-varying vector autoregressive dynamic spillover index (TVP-VAR-DY) model, to examine the spillover effects of EU economic sanctions against Russia on oil prices and share prices of third-country energy companies, as well as takes China and the USA as examples for analysis. The findings indicate that sanctions targeting the energy sector are the primary drivers of volatility in oil prices and energy company stock prices. The impact on Chinese energy firms' stock prices is more pronounced, while the effects on their American counterparts are more enduring. The indirect impact of EU sanctions on Russia on China is greater than that of the USA. Both direct and indirect sanctions exhibit comparable spillover effects on oil and stock prices. Direct sanctions have better explanatory power for stock price fluctuations, while indirect sanctions have better explanatory power for oil price fluctuations.

摘要

本研究建立了一套全面的制裁指数,并采用时变向量自回归动态溢出指数(TVP-VAR-DY)模型,考察了欧盟对俄罗斯经济制裁对石油价格和第三国能源公司股价的溢出效应,并以中国和美国为例进行了分析。研究结果表明,针对能源部门的制裁是石油价格和能源公司股价波动的主要驱动因素。对中国能源企业股价的影响更为显著,而对美国能源企业的影响则更为持久。欧盟对俄罗斯的间接制裁对中国的影响大于美国。直接和间接制裁对石油和股票价格都有类似的溢出效应。直接制裁对股价波动具有更好的解释力,而间接制裁对油价波动具有更好的解释力。

相似文献

1
Dynamic spillover effects between EU economic sanctions against Russia, oil prices, and share prices of energy companies in third countries: evidence from China and the USA.欧盟对俄罗斯经济制裁、石油价格与第三国能源公司股价之间的动态溢出效应:来自中国和美国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):19381-19395. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32250-z. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Spillovers from global economic policy uncertainty and oil price volatility to the volatility of stock markets of oil importers and exporters.全球经济政策不确定性和石油价格波动对石油进出口国股票市场波动的溢出效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):15603-15613. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16722-0. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
3
Oil prices and E7 stock prices: an asymmetric evidence using multiple threshold nonlinear ARDL model.油价与 E7 股价:基于多重门槛非线性 ARDL 模型的非对称证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(35):44183-44194. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10277-2. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
4
The impact of crude oil prices on Chinese stock markets and selected sectors: evidence from the VAR-DCC-GARCH model.原油价格对中国股票市场及部分板块的影响:基于 VAR-DCC-GARCH 模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):52560-52573. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19573-5. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
WTI, Brent or implied volatility index: Perspective of volatility spillover from oil market to Chinese stock market.西德克萨斯中质原油(WTI)、布伦特原油或隐含波动率指数:石油市场对中国股票市场的波动率溢出效应研究
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 25;19(4):e0302131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302131. eCollection 2024.
6
Volatility connectedness of GCC stock markets: how global oil price volatility drives volatility spillover in GCC stock markets?GCC 股票市场的波动关联性:全球油价波动如何引发 GCC 股票市场的波动溢出?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14212-14222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23114-5. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
7
The dynamics of volatility spillovers between oil prices and stock market returns at the sector level and hedging strategies: evidence from Pakistan.油价与股票市场回报率在部门层面的波动溢出动态及对冲策略:来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):30706-30715. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09351-6. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Volatility transmission between oil prices and banks' stock prices as a new source of instability: Lessons from the United States experience.油价与银行股价之间的波动传导作为一种新的不稳定来源:来自美国经验的教训。
Econ Model. 2020 Sep;91:198-217. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Co-movement of energy prices and stock market return: environmental wavelet nexus of COVID-19 pandemic from the USA, Europe, and China.能源价格与股票市场回报的共同变动:来自美国、欧洲和中国的新冠疫情环境小波联系
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb 23;28(25):32359-73. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12938-2.
10
Extreme risk spillover from uncertainty to carbon markets in China and the EU-A time varying copula approach.极端风险溢出从不确定性到中国和欧盟的碳市场-时变 Copula 方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt A):116634. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116634. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic sanction: a weapon of mass destruction.经济制裁:大规模杀伤性武器。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):816-817. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31944-5. Epub 2018 Aug 20.