Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Hospital Dr. Sótero del Rio, Santiago, Chile.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jun;33(6S):S64-S73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.020. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of severe proximal humerus bone loss can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a modular segmental megaprosthesis when implanted in a reverse configuration for complex primary arthroplasty, reconstruction at the time of oncologic resection, and revision shoulder arthroplasty.
A Joint Registry Database was queried to identify all shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single institution using the Comprehensive Segmental Revision System reverse shoulder arthroplasty (SRS-RSA; Zimmer Biomet). A retrospective review of electronic medical records and radiographs was performed to record demographic data, indication, outcomes, complications, and revision surgery.
Between February 2012 and October 2022, a total of 76 consecutive SRS-RSAs were implanted. An analysis of patients with minimum 12-month follow-up yielded 53 patients with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.43 years. Surgical complication rate in this cohort was observed in 41.5% (22 of 53) of cases. Overall, the revision rate at final follow-up was 26.4% (14 of 53), with a significant difference between the primary and revision cohorts. The number of prior surgeries was a significant risk factor for revision surgery, with a hazard ratio of 1.789 (95% confidence interval 1.314-2.436, P < .001). When analyzing aseptic humeral loosening rates across study cohorts, a significant difference was found between the primary arthroplasty (0%, n = 0) and the revision arthroplasty cohorts (22.2%, n = 6) (P = .04).
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a modular segmental megaprosthesis remains a reasonable salvage option for shoulder reconstruction in the setting of proximal humeral bone loss. Because of the substantial bone loss and soft tissue deficiencies typically present in these cases, surgeons should educate patients on the relatively high complication rate, particularly when used in the setting of a previous failed arthroplasty.
在严重肱骨近端骨丢失的情况下进行肩关节置换术具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估模块化节段性假体在反向配置下用于复杂初次置换、肿瘤切除时的重建和肩关节翻修时的效果。
对单机构使用 Comprehensive Segmental Revision System 反向肩关节置换术(SRS-RSA;Zimmer Biomet)进行的所有肩关节置换术进行了关节注册数据库查询。对电子病历和 X 线片进行回顾性分析,以记录人口统计学数据、适应证、结果、并发症和翻修手术。
在 2012 年 2 月至 2022 年 10 月期间,共植入了 76 例连续的 SRS-RSA。对具有至少 12 个月随访的患者进行分析,53 例患者的平均随访时间为 4.1±2.43 年。该队列中观察到手术并发症发生率为 41.5%(22/53)。总体而言,最终随访时的翻修率为 26.4%(53 例中有 14 例),初次置换和翻修队列之间存在显著差异。既往手术次数是翻修手术的显著危险因素,风险比为 1.789(95%置信区间 1.314-2.436,P<.001)。在分析研究队列中的无菌性肱骨头松动率时,在初次置换组(0%,n=0)和翻修置换组(22.2%,n=6)之间发现了显著差异(P=.04)。
在肱骨近端骨丢失的情况下,使用模块化节段性假体进行反向肩关节置换术仍然是肩部重建的合理挽救选择。由于这些病例通常存在大量的骨丢失和软组织缺陷,因此外科医生应告知患者相对较高的并发症发生率,特别是在先前失败的关节置换术的情况下使用时。