School of Psychological Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2024 Apr;50(2):328-347. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12694. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
While hostile attributional bias (a tendency to interpret others' behaviors as intentionally hostile) is associated with negative outcomes in romantic relationships, no measure has been developed specifically for this context. Here, we describe the development and validation of a self-report questionnaire across three studies, named Hostile Attribution in Romantic Relationships Test. Study 1 introduces the development and preliminary validation (N = 152). Study 2 tests the validity and test-retest stability of the modified version revised based on findings in Study 1 (N = 151). Study 3 reports the translation and validation of a Chinese version (N = 630). The final 9-vignette scale is the first to specifically measure hostile attribution bias in romantic relationships, with good internal reliability, test-retest stability, and convergent validity. Factor analysis reveals a three-factor structure reflecting direct hostile attribution, indirect hostile attribution, and benign attribution to partners' behaviors. Implications regarding couple dynamics and clinical therapeutic interventions are discussed.
虽然敌意归因偏差(一种将他人行为解释为故意敌意的倾向)与浪漫关系中的负面结果有关,但针对这一情况还没有专门的测量方法。在这里,我们通过三项研究描述了一种名为“浪漫关系中敌意归因测验”的自我报告问卷的开发和验证过程。研究 1 介绍了开发和初步验证过程(N=152)。研究 2 根据研究 1 的发现检验了修正后版本的有效性和重测信度(N=151)。研究 3 报告了中文版本的翻译和验证(N=630)。最终的 9 个情境量表是第一个专门测量浪漫关系中敌意归因偏差的量表,具有良好的内部信度、重测信度和聚合效度。因子分析揭示了反映对伴侣行为的直接敌意归因、间接敌意归因和良性归因的三因素结构。还讨论了关于夫妻动态和临床治疗干预的影响。