Homant Robert J, Kennedy Daniel B
Department of Criminal Justice, University of Detroit Mercy, MI 48219-0900, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2003 Feb;92(1):185-94. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.185.
A 10-item Hostile Attribution Scale was developed to test the hypothesis that hostile attribution is predictive of support for aggression in frustrating workplace situations in which a supervisor's motivation is ambiguous. The Hostile Attribution Scale showed good test-retest reliability (.80), but weak internal consistency (alpha=.60). For one workplace scenario (Steve), hostile attribution predicted aggression in the ambiguous but not the definite version of the scenario. For the other scenario (Dan), however, hostile attribution in both the ambiguous and definite versions was equally predictive of aggression. Ambiguous situations are the most problematic for generating workplace aggression so research should focus on individual differences in hostile attributions.
一个包含10个项目的敌意归因量表被开发出来,以检验这样一个假设:在主管动机不明确的令人沮丧的工作场所情境中,敌意归因能够预测对攻击行为的支持。敌意归因量表显示出良好的重测信度(0.80),但内部一致性较弱(α = 0.60)。对于一个工作场所情景(史蒂夫),在情景的模糊版本而非明确版本中,敌意归因能够预测攻击行为。然而,对于另一个情景(丹),在模糊版本和明确版本中,敌意归因对攻击行为的预测作用是相同的。模糊情境对于引发工作场所攻击行为来说是最具问题的,因此研究应聚焦于敌意归因中的个体差异。