Herman Koby, Kiran Ravi P, Shen Bo
Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 15;12(2):E231-E236. doi: 10.1055/a-2230-7372. eCollection 2024 Feb.
The treatment of anorectal strictures is particularly challenging and historically focused on surgical resection and/or diversion. There are a number of endoscopic options, but repeat interventions are common. The use of the needle knife stricturotomy technique as an alternative to surgery in the treatment of a variety of strictures has been described, but its use for the treatment of severe anorectal and anopouch strictures has not been studied. Our Inflammatory Bowel Disease department's records were queried to identify patients with endoscopic non-traversable anorectal/anopouch strictures. Consecutive patients that underwent insulated tip/needle-knife endoscopic stricturotomy treatment were included. Primary outcome was immediate traversability of the treated stricture by the endoscope. Other outcomes included need for reintervention, 30-day post-procedure events, and follow-up period events. All strictures were immediately successfully traversed following endoscopic stricturotomy treatment. The mean time to endoscopic reintervention was 5.3 months, with the majority of these patients undergoing repeat stricturotomy. Over a mean follow-up period of 12.8 months, two patients (8%) required surgical intervention (resection with coloanal anastomosis with a colostomy and complete proctectomy) for refractory stricture disease following initial endoscopic stricturotomy. Seven patients (29%) in our study have not required any further reintervention throughout the study period. There were no 30-day post-procedure adverse events and no adverse post-procedure events. Endoscopic stricturotomy is safe and effective in treating severe anorectal/anopouch strictures.
肛管直肠狭窄的治疗极具挑战性,历史上主要集中于手术切除和/或改道。虽然有多种内镜治疗选择,但重复干预很常见。已有人描述使用针刀狭窄切开术作为手术的替代方法来治疗多种狭窄,但其用于治疗严重肛管直肠和肛管袋狭窄的情况尚未得到研究。我们查询了炎症性肠病科的记录,以确定患有内镜无法通过的肛管直肠/肛管袋狭窄的患者。纳入了接受绝缘头/针刀内镜狭窄切开术治疗的连续患者。主要结局是内镜治疗后狭窄部位立即能够通过。其他结局包括再次干预的必要性、术后30天的事件以及随访期间的事件。内镜狭窄切开术后,所有狭窄部位均立即成功通过。内镜再次干预的平均时间为5.3个月,其中大多数患者接受了重复狭窄切开术。在平均12.8个月的随访期内,两名患者(8%)在初次内镜狭窄切开术后因难治性狭窄疾病需要手术干预(结肠肛管吻合术加结肠造口术切除和全直肠切除术)。在我们的研究中,7名患者(29%)在整个研究期间无需任何进一步的再次干预。术后30天没有不良事件,术后也没有不良事件。内镜狭窄切开术治疗严重肛管直肠/肛管袋狭窄安全有效。