Yagi Tsukasa, Nagao Ken, Yonemoto Naohiro, Gaieski David F, Tachibana Eizo, Ito Noritoshi, Shirai Shinichi, Tahara Yoshio, Nonogi Hiroshi, Ikeda Takanori
Department of Cardiology Nihon University Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Department of Public Health Juntendo University Tokyo Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031394. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care science and treatment recommendations (CoSTR) have reported updates on CPR maneuvers every 5 years since 2000. However, few national population-based studies have investigated the comprehensive effectiveness of those updates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythms. The primary objective of the present study was to determine whether CPR based on CoSTR 2005 or 2010 was associated with improved outcomes in Japan, as compared with CPR based on Guidelines 2000.
From the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2015, we included 73 578 adults who had shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest witnessed by bystanders or emergency medical service responders. The study outcomes over an 11-year period were compared between 2005 of the Guidelines 2000 era, from 2006 to 2010 of the CoSTR 2005 era, and from 2011 to 2015 of the CoSTR 2010 era. In the bystander-witnessed group, the adjusted odds ratios for favorable neurological outcomes at 30 days after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by enrollment year increased year by year (1.19 in 2006, and 3.01 in 2015). Similar results were seen in the emergency medical service responder-witnessed group and several subgroups.
Compared with CPR maneuvers for shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest recommended in the Guidelines 2000, CPR maneuver updates in CoSTR 2005 and 2010 were associated with improved neurologically intact survival year by year in Japan. Increased public awareness and greater dissemination of basic life support may be responsible for the observed improvement in outcomes.
URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: 000009918.
自2000年以来,国际心肺复苏(CPR)与心血管急救科学及治疗建议共识(CoSTR)每5年就会发布心肺复苏操作的更新内容。然而,很少有基于全国人口的研究调查这些更新内容对因可电击心律导致的院外心脏骤停的综合有效性。本研究的主要目的是确定与基于2000年指南的心肺复苏相比,基于2005年或2010年CoSTR的心肺复苏在日本是否与更好的结局相关。
从2005年至2015年的全日本乌斯坦登记处,我们纳入了73578名由旁观者或紧急医疗服务响应者目击的因可电击心律导致的院外心脏骤停的成年人。在2000年指南时代的2005年、CoSTR 2005时代的2006年至2010年以及CoSTR 2010时代的2011年至2015年期间,对11年期间的研究结局进行了比较。在旁观者目击组中,院外心脏骤停后30天良好神经功能结局的校正比值比随入组年份逐年增加(2006年为1.19,2015年为3.01)。在紧急医疗服务响应者目击组和几个亚组中也观察到了类似结果。
与2000年指南中推荐的针对因可电击心律导致的院外心脏骤停的心肺复苏操作相比,2005年和2010年CoSTR中的心肺复苏操作更新在日本与逐年改善的神经功能完好生存率相关。公众意识的提高和基本生命支持的更广泛传播可能是观察到的结局改善的原因。