Suppr超能文献

人工智能驱动的远程监测技术在正畸治疗中评估患者口腔卫生状况的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Driven Remote Monitoring technology for assessment of patient oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 May;165(5):586-592. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.12.008. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to clinically evaluate the accuracy of Dental Monitoring's (DM) artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis and oral hygiene notification algorithm in identifying oral hygiene and mucogingival conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients seeking orthodontic therapy were monitored by DM oral hygiene protocol during their orthodontic treatment. During the bonding appointment and at each of 10 subsequent adjustment visits, a total of 232 clinical oral examinations were performed to assess the presence of the 3 oral hygiene parameters that DM monitors. In each clinical timepoint, the subjects took an oral DM scan and received a notification regarding their current oral status at that moment in time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to evaluate AI and clinical assessment of plaque, gingivitis, and recession.

RESULTS

A total of 232 clinical time points have been evaluated clinically and by the DM AI algorithm. For DM's AI detection of plaque and calculus, gingivitis, and recession, the sensitivity was 0.53, 0.35, and 0.22; the specificity was 0.94, 0.96, and 0.99; and the accuracy was 0.60, 0.49, and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DM's oral hygiene notification algorithm has low sensitivity, high specificity, and moderate accuracy. This indicates a tendency of DM to underreport the presence of plaque, gingivitis, and recession.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在临床评估 Dental Monitoring(DM)人工智能(AI)图像分析和口腔卫生通知算法在识别口腔卫生和黏膜炎状况方面的准确性。

方法

24 名寻求正畸治疗的患者在正畸治疗期间按照 DM 口腔卫生方案进行监测。在粘接预约和随后的 10 次调整就诊中,共进行了 232 次临床口腔检查,以评估 DM 监测的 3 项口腔卫生参数的存在情况。在每个临床时间点,受试者进行了一次 DM 口腔扫描,并收到了关于他们当前口腔状况的通知。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以评估 AI 和临床评估菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩。

结果

总共评估了 232 个临床时间点,包括临床评估和 DM AI 算法评估。对于 DM 的 AI 检测菌斑和牙石、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩,敏感性分别为 0.53、0.35 和 0.22;特异性分别为 0.94、0.96 和 0.99;准确性分别为 0.60、0.49 和 0.72。

结论

DM 的口腔卫生通知算法敏感性低,特异性高,准确性中等。这表明 DM 倾向于低估菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩的存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验