Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 May;165(5):586-592. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.12.008. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
This study aimed to clinically evaluate the accuracy of Dental Monitoring's (DM) artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis and oral hygiene notification algorithm in identifying oral hygiene and mucogingival conditions.
Twenty-four patients seeking orthodontic therapy were monitored by DM oral hygiene protocol during their orthodontic treatment. During the bonding appointment and at each of 10 subsequent adjustment visits, a total of 232 clinical oral examinations were performed to assess the presence of the 3 oral hygiene parameters that DM monitors. In each clinical timepoint, the subjects took an oral DM scan and received a notification regarding their current oral status at that moment in time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to evaluate AI and clinical assessment of plaque, gingivitis, and recession.
A total of 232 clinical time points have been evaluated clinically and by the DM AI algorithm. For DM's AI detection of plaque and calculus, gingivitis, and recession, the sensitivity was 0.53, 0.35, and 0.22; the specificity was 0.94, 0.96, and 0.99; and the accuracy was 0.60, 0.49, and 0.72, respectively.
DM's oral hygiene notification algorithm has low sensitivity, high specificity, and moderate accuracy. This indicates a tendency of DM to underreport the presence of plaque, gingivitis, and recession.
本研究旨在临床评估 Dental Monitoring(DM)人工智能(AI)图像分析和口腔卫生通知算法在识别口腔卫生和黏膜炎状况方面的准确性。
24 名寻求正畸治疗的患者在正畸治疗期间按照 DM 口腔卫生方案进行监测。在粘接预约和随后的 10 次调整就诊中,共进行了 232 次临床口腔检查,以评估 DM 监测的 3 项口腔卫生参数的存在情况。在每个临床时间点,受试者进行了一次 DM 口腔扫描,并收到了关于他们当前口腔状况的通知。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以评估 AI 和临床评估菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩。
总共评估了 232 个临床时间点,包括临床评估和 DM AI 算法评估。对于 DM 的 AI 检测菌斑和牙石、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩,敏感性分别为 0.53、0.35 和 0.22;特异性分别为 0.94、0.96 和 0.99;准确性分别为 0.60、0.49 和 0.72。
DM 的口腔卫生通知算法敏感性低,特异性高,准确性中等。这表明 DM 倾向于低估菌斑、牙龈炎和牙龈退缩的存在。