Suppr超能文献

复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修正药物的成本效用和成本效益分析:一项系统评价

Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

作者信息

Gallehzan Nasrin Abulhasanbeigi, Khosravi Majid, Jamebozorgi Khosro, Mir Nazanin, Jalilian Habib, Soleimanpour Samira, Hoseini Saeed, Rezapour Aziz, Eshraghi Abbas

机构信息

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease. The economic burden of MS is substantial, and the high cost of Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) prices are the main drivers of healthcare expenditures. We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search covered articles published between May 2001 and May 2023. Studies that were written in English and Persian and examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of DMDs in patients with MS were included in our review. Data extraction was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). All costs were converted to 2020 U.S. dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).

RESULTS

The search yielded 1589 studies, and 49 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were mainly based on a European setting. Most studies employed Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness. The lowest and highest numerical value of outcome measures were -1,623,918 and 2,297,141.53, respectively. Furthermore, the lowest and highest numerical value of the cost of DMDs of RRMS were $180.67, and $1474840.19, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of all studies, it can be concluded that for the treatment of patients with MS, care-oriented strategies should be preferred to drug strategies. Also, among the drug strategies with different prescribing methods, oral disease-modifying drugs of RRMS should be preferred to injectable drugs and intravenous infusions.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)是一种慢性自身免疫性炎症性疾病。MS的经济负担巨大,疾病修正药物(DMDs)的高昂价格是医疗保健支出的主要驱动因素。我们对评估DMDs用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的成本效用和成本效益的研究进行了系统评价。

材料与方法

在PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Embase中进行检索。检索涵盖2001年5月至2023年5月发表的文章。纳入我们综述的研究需为英文或波斯文撰写,并研究了DMDs在MS患者中的成本效用和成本效益。数据提取以综合卫生经济评价报告标准(CHEERS)清单为指导,经济评价的质量使用卫生经济研究质量工具(QHES)进行评估。所有成本均使用购买力平价(PPP)换算为2020年美元。

结果

检索得到1589项研究,49项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究主要基于欧洲背景。大多数研究采用马尔可夫模型评估成本效益。结果指标的最低和最高数值分别为-1,623,918和2,297,141.53。此外,RRMS的DMDs成本的最低和最高数值分别为180.67美元和1,474,840.19美元。

结论

根据所有研究的结果,可以得出结论,对于MS患者的治疗,应以护理为导向的策略优于药物策略。此外,在不同处方方法的药物策略中,RRMS的口服疾病修正药物应优于注射药物和静脉输注药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69a9/10870486/ebc78005b5d6/13561_2024_478_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验