• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在黎巴嫩,对高疾病活动(HDA)复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)患者使用克拉屈滨片进行经济评价。

Economic evaluation of cladribine tablets in high disease activity (HDA) relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients in Lebanon.

机构信息

National Social Security Funds, Beirut, Lebanon.

American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Nov;67:104169. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104169. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104169
PMID:36150262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cladribine tablets are a newly launched short course oral treatment approved for high disease activity (HDA) relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The current analysis assessed the cost-utility and budgetary impact of introducing cladribine tablets in HDA-RMS patients compared with other HDA-RMS therapies in Lebanon.

METHODS

The global cost-utility and budget impact models were adapted from Lebanese National Social Security Fund (NSSF) perspective. The data for the models' adaptation were retrieved from the literature and validated by Lebanese experts. The comparators considered in the cost-utility model were alemtuzumab, fingolimod, and natalizumab while budget impact analysis additionally considered dimethyl fumarate. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the uncertainty in the analysis.

RESULTS

The cost-utility results showed that cladribine tablets are an economically dominant therapeutic strategy (i.e., less costly and better quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) compared to all comparators. The cost saving was driven by drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs; while incremental QALY gain was driven by differences in delayed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression. Sensitivity analysis showed that cladribine tablets have a high probability (99.3-100%) of being dominant at a threshold of 22,000 United States Dollars (approximately three times of gross domestic product) per QALY gained against different comparators. The budget impact analysis showed that the introduction of cladribine tablets would result in 5.0% to 21.5% savings in the overall budget over a period of five years.

CONCLUSIONS

Cladribine tablets are a cost-effective and a budget-saving treatment option for the treatment of HDA-RMS patients in Lebanon from the NSSF perspective.

摘要

背景

克拉屈滨片是一种新推出的短期口服治疗药物,适用于高疾病活动度(HDA)的复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)。本分析评估了在黎巴嫩,与其他 HDA-RMS 治疗方法相比,将克拉屈滨片用于 HDA-RMS 患者的成本效益和预算影响。

方法

全球成本效益和预算影响模型从黎巴嫩国家社会保障基金(NSSF)的角度进行了改编。模型改编的数据从文献中检索,并由黎巴嫩专家进行了验证。成本效益模型中考虑的比较药物为阿仑单抗、芬戈莫德和那他珠单抗,而预算影响分析还考虑了富马酸二甲酯。还进行了敏感性分析,以评估分析中的不确定性。

结果

成本效益结果表明,与所有比较药物相比,克拉屈滨片是一种经济上具有优势的治疗策略(即成本更低,质量调整生命年[QALY]更高)。成本节约是由药物获得、管理和监测成本驱动的;而增量 QALY 增益是由扩展残疾状态量表进展延迟的差异驱动的。敏感性分析表明,克拉屈滨片在不同比较药物的 22000 美元(约为国内生产总值的三倍)每 QALY 获益阈值下,具有 99.3%至 100%的高概率(优势)。预算影响分析表明,在五年期间,引入克拉屈滨片将使总体预算节省 5.0%至 21.5%。

结论

从 NSSF 的角度来看,克拉屈滨片是治疗黎巴嫩 HDA-RMS 患者的一种具有成本效益和节省预算的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of cladribine tablets in high disease activity (HDA) relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients in Lebanon.在黎巴嫩,对高疾病活动(HDA)复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)患者使用克拉屈滨片进行经济评价。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Nov;67:104169. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104169. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.在英国,克拉屈滨片、阿仑单抗和那他珠单抗治疗疾病活动度高的复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jul;21(7):676-686. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1461630. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Economic Evaluation of Cladribine Tablets in Patients With High Disease Activity-Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯高疾病活动度复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者克拉屈滨片的经济评价。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 Sep;25:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in The Netherlands.克拉屈滨片治疗荷兰复发性缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效果分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):857-873. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00500-8.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets and fingolimod in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in Spain.西班牙高疾病活动度复发型多发性硬化症的克拉屈滨片和芬戈莫德治疗的成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun;20(3):295-303. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2019.1635014. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis in Portugal.在葡萄牙,克拉屈滨片与芬戈莫德治疗高度活跃复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):484-491. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1717499. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Cladribine tablets are a cost-effective strategy in high-disease activity relapsing multiple sclerosis patients in Iran.在伊朗,克拉屈滨片对于高疾病活动度复发型多发性硬化症患者而言是一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。
Curr J Neurol. 2021 Jul 6;20(3):146-153. doi: 10.18502/cjn.v20i3.7690.
8
Cost Assessment Modelling of Treatments for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.高活性复发型多发性硬化症治疗的成本评估模型。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):800-818. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01186-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
[Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using cladribine (in tablets) for treatment of adult patients with remitting multiple sclerosis].[使用克拉屈滨(片剂)治疗缓解型多发性硬化症成年患者的药物经济学方面]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(8):30-36. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112108130.
10
Benefit-risk Assessment of Cladribine Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)评估克拉屈滨治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的获益风险。
Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):249-260.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Analytical Modelling of Medicines in the Middle East: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.中东地区药品的决策分析模型:经济评估研究的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x.
2
Cost-effectiveness of oral versus injectable disease modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review analysis.口服与注射用疾病修正疗法治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较:系统评价分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1288. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11800-8.
3
Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.
复发缓解型多发性硬化症疾病修正药物的成本效用和成本效益分析:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00478-7.
4
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.