Suppr超能文献

不同社会人口学指数国家儿童创伤性脑损伤的临床结局和资源利用差异。

Differences in clinical outcomes and resource utilization in pediatric traumatic brain injury between countries of different sociodemographic indices.

机构信息

Departments of1Pediatric Medicine and.

2SingHealth Duke-NUS Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Feb 16;33(5):461-468. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.PEDS23306. Print 2024 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization for children with moderate to severe TBIs between LMICs and non-LMICs in Asia and Latin America.

METHODS

The authors performed an observational multicenter study from January 2014 to February 2023 among children with moderate to severe TBIs admitted to participating pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the Pediatric Acute and Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN) and Red Colaborativa Pediátrica de Latinoamérica (LARed Network). They classified sites according to their 2019 sociodemographic index (SDI). Low, low-middle, and middle SDI sites were considered LMICs, while high-middle and high SDI sites were considered non-LMICs. The authors documented patient demographics and TBI management. Accounting for death, they recorded 14-day PICU-free and 28-day hospital-free days, with fewer free days indicating poorer outcome. The authors compared children who died and those who had poor functional outcomes (defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category [PCPC] level of moderate disability, severe disability, or vegetative state or coma) between LMICs and non-LMICs and performed a multivariable logistic regression analysis for predicting poor functional outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 771 children with TBIs were analyzed. Mortality was comparable between LMICs and non-LMICs (9.6% vs 12.9%, p = 0.146). Children with TBIs from LMICs were more likely to have a poor PCPC outcome (31.0% vs 21.3%, p = 0.004) and had fewer ICU-free days (median [IQR] 6 [0-10] days vs 8 [0-11] days, p = 0.004) and hospital-free days (median [IQR] 9 [0-18] days vs 13 [0-20] days, p = 0.007). Poor functional outcomes were associated with LMIC status (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.04-2.26), a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.88), and the presence of multiple trauma (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01-2.19). Children with TBIs in LMICs required greater resource utilization in the form of early intubation and mechanical ventilation (81.6% vs 73.2%, p = 0.006), use of hyperosmolar therapy (77.7% vs 63.6%, p < 0.001), and use of antiepileptic drugs (73.9% vs 53.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within Asia and Latin America, children with TBIs in LMICs were more likely to have poor functional outcomes and required greater resource utilization. Further research should focus on investigating causal factors and developing targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities.

摘要

目的

在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的负担不成比例地高。本研究旨在比较亚洲和拉丁美洲的 LMICs 和非-LMICs 中中重度 TBI 患儿的临床结局和医疗保健利用情况。

方法

作者于 2014 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,在儿科急性和危重病医学亚洲网络(PACCMAN)和拉丁美洲儿科协作网络(LARed Network)参与的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中对中重度 TBI 患儿进行了一项观察性多中心研究。作者根据其 2019 年社会人口指数(SDI)对地点进行了分类。低、中低和中 SDI 地点被视为 LMICs,而中高和高 SDI 地点被视为非-LMICs。作者记录了患者的人口统计学和 TBI 管理情况。考虑到死亡,他们记录了 14 天 PICU 无天数和 28 天医院无天数,无天数越少表明结局越差。作者比较了 LMICs 和非-LMICs 中死亡患儿和功能预后不良患儿(定义为儿科脑功能分类[PCPC]为中度残疾、重度残疾、植物状态或昏迷)之间的差异,并对功能预后不良进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

共分析了 771 例 TBI 患儿。LMICs 和非-LMICs 之间的死亡率相当(9.6% vs 12.9%,p=0.146)。来自 LMICs 的 TBI 患儿更有可能出现不良的 PCPC 结局(31.0% vs 21.3%,p=0.004),并且 ICU 无天数(中位数[IQR]6[0-10]天 vs 8[0-11]天,p=0.004)和医院无天数(中位数[IQR]9[0-18]天 vs 13[0-20]天,p=0.007)较少。不良功能结局与 LMIC 地位相关(调整后的比值比[aOR]1.53,95%置信区间[CI]1.04-2.26),格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较低(aOR 0.83,95%CI 0.78-0.88),且存在多发伤(aOR 1.49,95%CI 1.01-2.19)。LMICs 中 TBI 患儿更需要早期插管和机械通气(81.6% vs 73.2%,p=0.006)、高渗治疗(77.7% vs 63.6%,p<0.001)和使用抗癫痫药物(73.9% vs 53.1%,p<0.001)等更多资源。

结论

在亚洲和拉丁美洲,来自 LMICs 的 TBI 患儿更有可能出现不良的功能结局,并且需要更多的资源利用。进一步的研究应集中于调查因果因素,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以减轻这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验