Rafehi Muhammad, Möller Marius, Ismail Al-Khalil Wouroud, Stefan Sven Marcel
Department of Medical Education Augsburg, Augsburg University Medicine, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Pharm Res. 2024 Mar;41(3):411-417. doi: 10.1007/s11095-024-03656-8. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
Drugs with multiple targets, often annotated as 'unselective', 'promiscuous', 'multitarget', or 'polypharmacological', are widely considered in both academic and industrial research as a high risk due to the likelihood of adverse effects. However, retrospective analyses have shown that particularly approved drugs bear rich polypharmacological profiles. This raises the question whether our perception of the specificity paradigm ('one drug-one target concept') is correct - and if specifically multitarget drugs should be developed instead of being rejected. These questions provoke a paradigm shift - regarding the development of polypharmacological drugs not as a 'waste of investment', but acknowledging the existence of a 'lack of investment'. This perspective provides an insight into modern drug development highlighting latest drug candidates that have not been assessed in a broader polypharmacology-based context elsewhere embedded in a historic framework of classical and modern approved multitarget drugs. The article shall be an inspiration to the scientific community to re-consider current standards, and more, to evolve to a better understanding of polypharmacology from a challenge to an opportunity.
具有多个靶点的药物,通常被标注为“非选择性的”“杂乱的”“多靶点的”或“多药理学的”,由于存在不良反应的可能性,在学术研究和工业研究中都被广泛认为具有高风险。然而,回顾性分析表明,尤其是已获批的药物具有丰富的多药理学特征。这就引发了一个问题,即我们对特异性范式(“一种药物—一个靶点概念”)的认知是否正确,以及是否应该开发而非摒弃特定的多靶点药物。这些问题引发了一场范式转变,即不再将多药理学药物的开发视为“投资浪费”,而是承认存在“投资不足”的情况。这种观点为现代药物开发提供了一种见解,突出了最新的候选药物,这些药物在其他地方尚未在更广泛的基于多药理学的背景下进行评估,而是嵌入在经典和现代获批的多靶点药物的历史框架中。本文旨在激励科学界重新审视当前标准,更重要的是,从将多药理学视为一种挑战转变为一种机遇,从而更好地理解多药理学。