Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Pharmacology Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
MP3CV Laboratory, EA7517, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Sep 27;39(10):1662-1671. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae042.
Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA).
Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA.
A total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.
In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.
在接受透析治疗的患者中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的临床试验很少且没有定论,因为在欧洲 DOAC 并未被批准用于此类患者。在一项针对法国全国范围内慢性透析患者的注册研究中,我们比较了 DOAC 的超说明书使用与批准的维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)的有效性和安全性。
从法国肾脏流行病学和信息网络(REIN)注册中心提取接受透析治疗患者的数据,并与法国国家医疗保健系统数据库(Système National des Données de Santé,SNDS)的数据合并。符合条件的患者为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间首次开始接受口服抗凝剂治疗的透析患者。主要安全性结局是大出血事件的发生,主要有效性结局是血栓栓塞事件的发生。采用倾向评分加权因果 Cox 回归比较 DOAC 和 VKA 的安全性和有效性结局。
共有 8954 例患者首次开始透析后接受了口服抗凝剂(483 例 DOAC 和 8471 例 VKA)。中位(四分位距)随访 1.7(0.8-3.2)年后,2567 例患者发生首次血栓栓塞事件,1254 例患者发生出血事件。经过倾向评分调整后,与 VKA 治疗相比,DOAC 治疗患者血栓栓塞事件的风险显著降低[加权风险比(wHR)[95%置信区间(CI)]0.66(0.46;0.94)]。与 VKA 治疗相比,DOAC 治疗患者大出血事件的风险呈降低趋势,但无统计学意义[wHR(95%CI)0.68(0.41;1.12)]。这些结果在亚组和敏感性分析中一致。
在一组开始接受口服抗凝剂治疗的透析患者中,与 VKA 治疗相比,DOAC 的超说明书使用与血栓栓塞事件风险显著降低相关,与大出血风险降低相关,但无统计学意义。这为透析患者中 DOAC 的超说明书使用提供了保证。