Guo Zongwen, Wang Yufan, Ding Xiaoli, Lai Jiying, Chen Yijian
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, 341000 Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Queen Mary School, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 10;25(9):321. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509321. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis poses significant challenges. This review aimed to furnish clinicians with the latest clinical outcomes associated with apixaban and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in managing AF patients on dialysis.
Literature from the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2024 underwent systematic scrutiny for inclusion. The results were narratively summarized.
Six studies were included in this review, comprising the AXADIA-AFNET 8 study, the RENAL-AF trial, and four observational studies. In a French nationwide observational study, patients initiated on apixaban demonstrated a diminished risk of thromboembolic events (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.78) compared to those on VKAs. A retrospective review with a 2-year follow-up, encompassing patients with AF and ESKD on hemodialysis, evidenced no statistical difference in the risk of symptomatic bleeding and stroke between the apixaban and warfarin groups. Two retrospective studies based on the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database both indicated no statistical difference between apixaban and VKAs in the risk of thromboembolic events. One study reported that apixaban correlated with a reduced risk of major bleeding relative to warfarin (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.87), while the other study suggested that apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of mortality compared to warfarin (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-0.92). The AXADIA-AFNET 8 study found no differences between apixaban and VKAs in safety or effectiveness outcomes for AF patients on dialysis. The RENAL-AF trial, however, was deemed inadequate for drawing conclusions due to its small sample size.
Currently, the published studies generally support that apixaban exhibits non-inferior safety and effectiveness outcomes compared to VKAs for AF patients on dialysis.
对于接受透析的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者,房颤(AF)的抗凝治疗面临重大挑战。本综述旨在为临床医生提供阿哌沙班和维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)在管理透析AF患者方面的最新临床结果。
对截至2024年3月来自PubMed和Embase数据库的文献进行系统筛选以纳入研究。结果进行叙述性总结。
本综述纳入六项研究,包括AXADIA-AFNET 8研究、RENAL-AF试验以及四项观察性研究。在一项法国全国性观察性研究中,与接受VKA治疗的患者相比,起始使用阿哌沙班的患者血栓栓塞事件风险降低(风险比[HR]:0.49;95%置信区间[CI]:0.20-0.78)。一项对接受血液透析的AF和ESKD患者进行的为期2年随访的回顾性研究表明,阿哌沙班组和华法林组在有症状出血和中风风险方面无统计学差异。两项基于美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)数据库的回顾性研究均表明,阿哌沙班和VKA在血栓栓塞事件风险方面无统计学差异。一项研究报告称,相对于华法林,阿哌沙班与大出血风险降低相关(HR:0.72,95%CI:0.59-0.87),而另一项研究表明,与华法林相比,阿哌沙班与死亡率降低相关(HR:0.85,95%CI:0.78-0.92)。AXADIA-AFNET 8研究发现,对于透析AF患者,阿哌沙班和VKA在安全性或有效性结果方面无差异。然而,RENAL-AF试验由于样本量小而被认为不足以得出结论。
目前,已发表的研究普遍支持,对于透析AF患者,与VKA相比,阿哌沙班在安全性和有效性结果方面表现出非劣效性。