• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lack of correlation between intragastric pressure and early gastric emptying rate after proximal gastric vagotomy.

作者信息

Oliveira R B, Ceneviva R, Troncon L E

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 1985;18(4):471-5.

PMID:3836705
Abstract

In order to evaluate the contribution of the impairment of the gastric accommodation to distension to the abnormalities of the gastric emptying of a liquid meal, these functions were evaluated simultaneously in 20 duodenal ulcer patients after proximal gastric vagotomy and in 13 non-operated duodenal ulcer patients. Gastric accommodation was measured by recording intragastric pressure during intragastric instillation of 500 ml 10% dextrose and the gastric emptying of this solution was measured with the double-sample test meal with phenol red as unabsorbable marker. The intragastric volume remaining 10 min after the 500 ml 10% dextrose test meal was significantly (P less than 0.02) smaller in the post-vagotomy patients (range: 60.0 to 580.0 ml; median: 320.0 ml) than in the non-operated patients (range: 220.0 to 540.0 ml; median: 380.0 ml). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the half-life of the test meal in the stomach. Maximal intragastric pressure was significantly higher (P less than 0.02) in post-vagotomy patients (range: 3.3 to 14.5 mmHg; median: 8.7 mmHg) than in non-operated patients (range: 1.8 to 5.5 mmHg; median: 3.8 mmHg). There was no significant correlation between maximal intragastric pressure and volume remaining 10 min after the test meal or half-life values within any group. These results confirm other studies showing that the initial gastric emptying rate of a liquid meal is accelerated and the gastric accommodation to distension is impaired by proximal gastric vagotomy, while overall gastric emptying is not changed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Lack of correlation between intragastric pressure and early gastric emptying rate after proximal gastric vagotomy.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1985;18(4):471-5.
2
[Effect of fundus vagotomy on the gastric emptying of the solids and liquids of a meal in patients with and without postoperative duodenal ulcer recurrence].[胃底迷走神经切断术对有和无十二指肠溃疡术后复发患者进餐时固体和液体胃排空的影响]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1985 Jun-Jul;9(6-7):486-90.
3
Gastric accommodation to distension and early gastric emptying in diabetics with neuropathy.糖尿病神经病变患者的胃对扩张的适应性及早期胃排空情况
Braz J Med Biol Res. 1984;17(1):49-53.
4
The importance of the distal stomach in gastric emptying of liquids in man.胃远端在人体液体胃排空中的重要性。
Surg Gastroenterol. 1984;3(1):13-20.
5
[Effect of a liquid protein meal on acid secretion, gastric emptying and serum gastrin before and after fundic vagotomy for duodenal ulcer].[液体蛋白餐对十二指肠溃疡胃底迷走神经切断术前、后胃酸分泌、胃排空及血清胃泌素的影响]
Reprod Nutr Dev (1980). 1980;20(4B):1143-8.
6
Gastric emptying of liquids after highly selective vagotomy for duodenal ulcer.十二指肠溃疡高选择性迷走神经切断术后液体的胃排空情况。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1989 Apr;36(2):92-6.
7
The effect of a segmental gastrectomy with proximal gastric vagotomy on gastric secretion and gastric emptying.胃近端迷走神经切断术联合节段性胃切除术对胃液分泌及胃排空的影响。
Br J Surg. 1984 Jun;71(6):431-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710609.
8
[Rate of gastric emptying after vagotomy in duodenal ulcer].[十二指肠溃疡迷走神经切断术后的胃排空速率]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1983 Oct;131(10):14-8.
9
Distribution of a liquid meal within the stomach and gastric emptying after vagotomy and drainage operations.液体餐在胃内的分布以及迷走神经切断术和引流术后的胃排空情况。
Gut. 1982 Aug;23(8):683-91. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.8.683.
10
Intragastric pressure/volume relationship before and after proximal gastric vagotomy.近端胃迷走神经切断术前和术后的胃内压力/容量关系
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1975;10(2):129-34.