Suppr超能文献

开放式与内镜下后环分离术联合腹横肌释放术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。

Comparison of open and endoscopic posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: a propensity score-matched study.

机构信息

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1, Ostrovityanov Str., Moscow, Russia, 117997.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2145-2150. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02964-7. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) is considered to be the optimal technique for large incisional ventral hernia repair. Endoscopic TAR (eTAR) that gets all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) gives a possibility to enhance results of the treatment. The aim of our study was to make the comparison between open and endoscopic TAR procedures with an emphasis on frequency and severity of postoperative complications in comparable groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients had midline incisional hernia and underwent either open (open TAR group) or endoscopic (eTAR group) Rives-Stoppa repair in combination with bilateral transversus abdominis release in Moscow City Hospital №1 from January 2018 to December 2022. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to make groups comparable. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo Classification, and Comprehensive complication index was calculated.

RESULTS

We performed 133 open and endoscopic TAR separation for midline incisional hernia. After PSM analysis 51 patients were matched to each group. Overall surgical morbidity in the open TAR group (56.9%) was statistically significantly higher than in the eTAR group (29.4%) (p = 0.009). There were more severe complications (Clavien IIIa-V) in the open TAR group (11.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.027). Length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter in eTAR group (p < 0.001). The Comprehensive complication index in the open TAR group was significantly higher than in eTAR group, 8.7 (0-20.9) vs. 0 (0-8.7) (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Based on the data from our study, the entire MIS procedure including endoscopic TAR is a safe and optimal technique for surgery of midline incisional ventral hernia, requiring TAR separation in terms of reducing the rate of postoperative complications, their severity and hospital length of stay, compared to open TAR procedure.

摘要

背景

经腹横肌平面分离联合腹直肌松解(TAR)被认为是治疗大型切口腹前壁疝的最佳技术。而具有微创外科(MIS)所有优势的内镜 TAR(eTAR)为治疗结果的提升提供了可能。本研究的目的是对开放式和内镜 TAR 手术进行比较,重点关注可比组中术后并发症的频率和严重程度。

材料和方法

所有患者均患有中线切口疝,并于 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月在莫斯科市立医院 1 号接受了开放式(开放式 TAR 组)或内镜式(eTAR 组)Rives-Stoppa 修复术,同时行双侧 TAR 松解术。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)使组间具有可比性。术后并发症根据 Clavien-Dindo 分类进行分类,并计算综合并发症指数。

结果

我们对 133 例中线切口疝行开放式和内镜 TAR 分离术。经 PSM 分析,每组匹配 51 例患者。开放式 TAR 组(56.9%)的总手术发病率明显高于 eTAR 组(29.4%)(p=0.009)。开放式 TAR 组有更多严重并发症(Clavien IIIa-V)(11.8%比 0%,p=0.027)。eTAR 组术后住院时间更短(p<0.001)。开放式 TAR 组的综合并发症指数明显高于 eTAR 组,分别为 8.7(0-20.9)和 0(0-8.7)(p=0.011)。

结论

根据我们的研究数据,包括内镜 TAR 的整个 MIS 手术是治疗 TAR 分离中线切口腹前壁疝的安全且最佳技术,与开放式 TAR 手术相比,可降低术后并发症的发生率、严重程度和住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验