• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国与腹部手术相关的切口疝发病率和支出的国家流行病学趋势(2008-2018 年)。

National epidemiologic trends (2008-2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery.

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 51 North 39th Street, Wright Saunders Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1355-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02644-4. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-022-02644-4
PMID:36006563
Abstract

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether the trend of rising incisional hernia (IH) repair (IHR) incidence and costs until 2011 currently persists. We aimed to evaluate how the IHR procedure incidence, cost and patient risk-profile have changed over the last decade relative to all abdominal surgeries (AS).

METHODS

Repeated cross-sectional analysis of 38,512,737 patients undergoing inpatient 4AS including IHR within the 2008-2018 National Inpatient Sample. Yearly incidence (procedures/1,000,000 people [PMP]), hospital costs, surgical and patient characteristics were compared between IHR and AS using generalized linear and multinomial regression.

RESULTS

Between 2008-2018, 3.1% of AS were IHR (1,200,568/38,512,737). There was a steeper decrease in the incidence of AS (356.5 PMP/year) compared to IHR procedures (12.0 PMP/year) which resulted in the IHR burden relative to AS (2008-2018: 12,576.3 to 9,113.4 PMP; trend difference P < 0.01). National costs averaged $47.9 and 1.7 billion/year for AS and IHR, respectively. From 2008-2018, procedure costs increased significantly for AS (68.2%) and IHR (74.6%; trends P < 0.01). Open IHR downtrended (42.2%), whereas laparoscopic (511.1%) and robotic (19,301%) uptrended significantly (trends P < 0.01). For both AS and IHR, the proportion of older (65-85y), Black and Hispanic, publicly-insured, and low-income patients, with higher comorbidity burden, undergoing elective procedures at small- and medium-sized hospitals uptrended significantly (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

IH persists as a healthcare burden as demonstrated by the increased proportion of IHR relative to all AS, disproportionate presence of high-risk patients that undergo these procedures, and increased costs. Targeted efforts for IH prevention have the potential of decreasing $17 M/year in costs for every 1% reduction.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚直到 2011 年为止,切口疝(IH)修复(IHR)发病率和成本上升的趋势是否持续。我们旨在评估过去十年中,与所有腹部手术(AS)相比,IHR 手术的发病率、成本和患者风险状况发生了怎样的变化。

方法

使用广义线性和多项回归,对 2008-2018 年全国住院患者样本中 38512737 例接受住院 4AS(包括 IHR)的患者进行了 38512737 例患者的重复横截面分析。使用广义线性和多项回归,比较了 IHR 和 AS 之间每年的发病率(每 100 万人[PMP]的手术程序)、医院成本、手术和患者特征。

结果

在 2008-2018 年期间,3.1%的 AS 为 IHR(1200568/38512737)。AS 的发病率下降幅度较大(356.5 PMP/年),而 IHR 手术的发病率下降幅度较小(12.0 PMP/年),这导致 IHR 相对于 AS 的负担增加(2008-2018 年:12576.3 至 9113.4 PMP;趋势差异 P < 0.01)。AS 和 IHR 的国家平均成本分别为 47.9 亿美元和 170 亿美元/年。从 2008 年至 2018 年,AS 和 IHR 的手术费用分别显著增加(68.2%和 74.6%;趋势 P < 0.01)。开放式 IHR 呈下降趋势(42.2%),而腹腔镜(511.1%)和机器人(19301%)呈显著上升趋势(趋势 P < 0.01)。对于 AS 和 IHR,年龄在 65-85 岁、黑人、西班牙裔、公保和低收入患者的比例,以及具有更高合并症负担的择期手术患者的比例均显著上升(所有 P < 0.01)。

结论

IH 仍然是医疗保健的负担,这表现在 IHR 相对于所有 AS 的比例增加,高风险患者进行这些手术的比例不成比例,以及成本增加。针对 IH 预防的有针对性的努力有可能使每年每降低 1%的费用减少 1700 万美元。

相似文献

1
National epidemiologic trends (2008-2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery.美国与腹部手术相关的切口疝发病率和支出的国家流行病学趋势(2008-2018 年)。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1355-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02644-4. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Incidence of Incisional Hernia Repair After Laparoscopic Compared to Open Resection of Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis of 17,717 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌切除术术后切口疝修补的发生率:一项全国范围内 17717 例患者的分析。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1627-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05375-8.
3
Open versus laparoscopic rectal cancer resection and risk of subsequent incisional hernia repair and paracolostomy hernia repair: a nationwide population-based cohort study.开腹与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术与后续切口疝修补术和结肠旁疝修补术风险的关系:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):134-144. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5648-0. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
4
Current national practice patterns for inpatient management of ventral abdominal wall hernia in the United States.美国目前腹前壁疝住院治疗的全国实践模式。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4104-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3075-4. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
One-Year Health Care Utilization and Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair in the United States: A Population-Based Study Using the Nationwide Readmission Database.美国切口疝修补术后一年的医疗保健利用情况及复发率:一项基于全国再入院数据库的人群研究
J Surg Res. 2020 Nov;255:267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.070. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
6
Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost.腹部手术后切口疝发展对总医疗成本的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2381-2386. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5936-8. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Risk of incisional hernia repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病患者的切口疝修补术风险。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 May;25(5):964-975. doi: 10.1111/codi.16478. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Closing the gap between the laparoscopic and open approaches to abdominal wall hernia repair: a trend and outcomes analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.缩小腹壁疝修补腹腔镜手术与开放手术方法之间的差距:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的趋势与结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3267-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4650-7. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
At least ninety days of follow-up are required to adequately detect wound outcomes after open incisional hernia repair.至少需要 90 天的随访,以充分检测开放式切口疝修补术后的伤口结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8463-8471. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09143-8. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Outcomes for incisional hernia repair in patients undergoing concomitant surgical procedures.接受同期外科手术的患者切口疝修补的结果。
Am Surg. 2012 Feb;78(2):243-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive bibliometric and visualized analysis of research on incisional hernia and component separation from 1996 to 2023.1996年至2023年切口疝与成分分离研究的综合文献计量学与可视化分析
JPRAS Open. 2025 Apr 25;45:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.012. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
3
Comparison of open and endoscopic posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: a propensity score-matched study.

本文引用的文献

1
Operating costs, fiscal impact, value analysis and guidance for the routine use of robotic technology in abdominal surgical procedures.腹部外科手术中常规使用机器人技术的运营成本、财政影响、价值分析和指导。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1433-1443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08428-8. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
Training on Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery during Surgical Residency: Integrating Surgical Education and Advanced Techniques.外科住院医师培训期间的微创结直肠手术:整合外科教育与先进技术
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021 May;34(3):194-200. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722843. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
Bilateral transversus abdominis release: Complex hernia repair without sacrificing quality of life.
开放式与内镜下后环分离术联合腹横肌释放术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2145-2150. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02964-7. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
4
Incidence, risk factors, and burden of incisional hernia repair after abdominal surgery in France: a nationwide study.法国腹部手术后切口疝修补的发生率、风险因素和负担:一项全国性研究。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):861-871. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02825-9. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
Impact of a multidisciplinary team discussion on planned ICU admissions after complex abdominal wall reconstruction.多学科团队讨论对复杂腹壁重建后计划转入 ICU 的影响。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):623-633. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02762-7. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
双侧腹横肌松解术:不牺牲生活质量的复杂疝修补术。
Am J Surg. 2022 Feb;223(2):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Early versus delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction with biologic mesh following damage-control surgery.损伤控制性手术后尽早与延迟使用生物补片进行复杂腹壁重建。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Mar 1;90(3):527-534. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003011.
5
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Mesh: The PROVE-IT Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹膜内补片修补术治疗腹壁疝的患者报告结局:PROVE-IT 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):22-29. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4569.
6
Biomechanical Parameters of Mesh Reinforcement and Analysis of a Novel Device for Incisional Hernia Prevention.网片加固的生物力学参数和一种新型切口疝预防装置的分析。
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.068. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Predictors of 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Biological Mesh: A Longitudinal Study of 232 Patients.生物补片复杂腹壁重建术后 30 天和 90 天再入院的预测因素:232 例患者的纵向研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Nov;44(11):3720-3728. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05714-9. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Short-term quality of life comparison of laparoscopic, open, and robotic incisional hernia repairs.腹腔镜、开放式和机器人切口疝修补术的短期生活质量比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2781-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07711-4. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Financial impact of adapting robotics to a thoracic practice in an academic institution.在学术机构中,将机器人技术应用于胸科医疗实践的财务影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(2):89-96. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.140.
10
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.