Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH United Kingdom; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 80 Vasilissis Sofias Avenue, Athens 11528, Greece.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Apr;295:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
To perform a network meta-analysis to specify the route of administration that maximises the effectiveness of each of the available prophylactic uterotonics without increasing the risk for side effects. 2.
Literature searches on 12th September 2022 included: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The reference lists of the retrieved study records were also searched. 3.
Population: Randomized controlled trials involving women in the third stage of labour after a vaginal or caesarean delivery in hospital or community settings.
Systemically administered prophylactic uterotonics of any route and dose for primary postpartum hemorrhage prevention. Comparison: Any other prophylactic uterotonic, or a different route or dose of a given uterotonic, or placebo, or no treatment. Outcomes (primary): postpartum hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL and ≥ 1000 mL. 4.
Risk of bias and trustworthiness assessments were performed, according to Cochrane's guidance. Direct, indirect and network meta-analyses were conducted, and results were summarized either as risk ratio or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The certainty of generated evidence was assessed according to the GRADE approach. Cumulative probabilities were calculated and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to create a ranking of the available drugs. 5.
One hundred eighty-one studies involving 122,867 randomised women were included. Most studies were conducted in hospital settings in lower-middle income countries and involved women delivering vaginally. When compared with intramuscular oxytocin, carbetocin (RR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.40-0.84) and oxytocin (RR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.59-0.97) by an intravenous bolus, and intramuscular ergometrine plus oxytocin combination (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56-0.91) are probably more effective in preventing primary postpartum hemorrhage. Intramuscularly administered oxytocin and carbetocin by an intravenous bolus have a favourable side effects profile. 6.
Generated evidence was generally moderate and global inconsistency was low. Carbetocin and oxytocin by an intravenous bolus, and intramuscular ergometrine plus oxytocin combination are probably the top uterotonics for primary postpartum hemorrhage prevention. Large scale studies exploring different routes of administration for available prophylactic uterotonics, and women's views should be conducted.
目的:进行网状荟萃分析,以确定每种现有预防产后出血的药物的最佳给药途径,同时不增加副作用风险。
数据来源:文献检索于 2022 年 9 月 12 日在以下数据库进行:CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。还检索了检索研究记录的参考文献列表。
研究入选标准:人群:在医院或社区环境中分娩后的第三产程中随机接受阴道或剖宫产的女性。
干预措施:全身给予任何途径和剂量的预防产后出血的宫缩剂。比较:任何其他预防产后出血的宫缩剂,或一种宫缩剂的不同途径或剂量,或安慰剂,或不治疗。结局(主要):产后出血≥500mL 和≥1000mL。
风险评估和可信度评估:根据 Cochrane 的指导进行了风险评估和可信度评估。直接、间接和网状荟萃分析进行了,结果分别以风险比或均数差值(二分类和连续结局)表示。根据 GRADE 方法评估生成证据的确定性。计算了累积概率,并使用累积排序曲线下的面积来创建可用药物的排序。
结果:纳入了 181 项研究,涉及 122867 名随机女性。大多数研究在中低收入国家的医院环境中进行,涉及阴道分娩的女性。与肌内注射催产素相比,卡贝缩宫素(RR 0.58,95%CI 0.40-0.84)和催产素(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.59-0.97)静脉推注,以及肌内注射麦角新碱加催产素(RR 0.71,95%CI 0.56-0.91)可能更有效预防原发性产后出血。静脉推注肌内注射催产素和卡贝缩宫素具有良好的副作用特征。
结论:生成的证据总体上为中等,全球不一致性较低。卡贝缩宫素和催产素静脉推注,以及肌内注射麦角新碱加催产素组合可能是预防原发性产后出血的首选宫缩剂。应该进行大规模研究,探索现有预防产后出血药物的不同给药途径,以及女性的观点。