Gómez-Pertusa Carlos, García-Poyo M Carmen, Grindlay Guillermo, Pedraza Ricardo, Yáñez M Adela, Gras Luis
University of Alicante, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, PO Box 99, 03080, Alicante, Spain.
LABAQUA S.A.U, c/ Dracma, 16-18, Polígono industrial Las Atalayas, 03114, Alicante, Spain.
Talanta. 2024 May 15;272:125742. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.125742. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
Current sample preparation strategies for nanomaterials (NMs) analysis in soils by means single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry have significant constrains in terms of accuracy, sample throughput and applicability (i.e., type of NMs and soils). In this work, strengths and weakness of microwave assisted extraction (MAE) for NMs characterization in soils were systematically investigated. To this end, different extractants were tested (ultrapure water; NaOH, NHOH, sodium citrate and tetrasodium pyrophosphate) and MAE operating conditions were optimized by means of design of experiments. Next, the developed method was applied to different type of metallic(oid) nanoparticles (Se-, Ag-, Pt- and AuNPs) and soils (alkaline, acid, sandy, clayey, SL36, loam ERMCC141; sludge amended ERM483). Results show that Pt- and AuNPs are preserved and quantitatively extracted from soils in 6 min (12 cycles of 30 s each) inside an 800 W oven by using 20 mL of 0.1 M NaOH solution. This methodology is applicable to soils showing a wide range of physicochemical properties except for clay rich samples. If clay soil fraction is significant (>15%), NMs are efficiently retained in the soil thus giving rise to poor recoveries (<10%). The analysis of labile NMs such as Se- and AgNPs is not feasible by means this approach since extraction conditions favors dissolution. Finally, when compared to current extraction methodologies (e.g., ultrasound, cloud point extraction, etc.), MAE affords better or equivalent accuracies and precision as well as higher sample throughput due to treatment speed and the possibility to work with several samples simultaneously.
目前通过单颗粒电感耦合等离子体质谱法分析土壤中纳米材料(NMs)的样品制备策略在准确性、样品通量和适用性(即NMs和土壤的类型)方面存在重大限制。在这项工作中,系统地研究了微波辅助萃取(MAE)用于土壤中NMs表征的优缺点。为此,测试了不同的萃取剂(超纯水;氢氧化钠、氢氧化铵、柠檬酸钠和焦磷酸四钠),并通过实验设计优化了MAE操作条件。接下来,将所开发的方法应用于不同类型的金属(类金属)纳米颗粒(硒、银、铂和金纳米颗粒)和土壤(碱性、酸性、沙质、黏土质、SL36、壤土ERMCC141;添加污泥的ERM483)。结果表明,使用20 mL 0.1 M氢氧化钠溶液,在800 W的烘箱中,铂和金纳米颗粒在6分钟内(每次30秒,共12个循环)从土壤中得到保留并被定量萃取。除了富含黏土的样品外,该方法适用于具有广泛物理化学性质的土壤。如果黏粒土部分占比很大(>15%),NMs会有效地保留在土壤中,从而导致回收率较低(<10%)。由于萃取条件有利于溶解,因此通过这种方法分析诸如硒和银纳米颗粒等活性NMs是不可行的。最后,与目前的萃取方法(如超声、浊点萃取等)相比,由于处理速度快且能够同时处理多个样品,MAE具有更好或相当的准确度和精密度以及更高的样品通量。