DSI/NRF Research Chair, Shallow Water Ecosystems, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031, South Africa; Department of Botany, Institute of Coastal and Marine Research (CMR), Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031, South Africa; Department of Chemistry, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031, South Africa; Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/753, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Chemistry, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031, South Africa.
Environ Res. 2024 Jun 1;250:118465. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118465. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
Estuaries in South Africa are very important for biodiversity conservation and serve as focal points for leisure and tourism activities. The organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) levels in these aquatic systems haven't been documented in any studies as of yet. Due to the negative effects of persistent organic pollutants in South African estuaries, we examined the occurrence of eight OPFRs in sediments of two estuaries by studying their spatiotemporal distribution, season variation, and ecological risks. The Sundays Estuary (SDE), a semi-urbanized agricultural surrounding system, recorded an ∑OPFR concentration in sediments that ranged from 0.71 to 22.5 ng/g dw, whereas Swartkops Estuary, a largely urbanized system, recorded a concentration that ranged from 0.61 to 119 ng/g dw. Alkyl-OPFRs were the prevalent homologue in both estuaries compared to the chlorinated and aryl groups. While TBP, TCPP, and TCrP were the most abundant compounds among the homologue groups. There was no distinct seasonal trend of ∑OPFR concentration in either estuary, with summer and autumn seasons recording the highest concentrations in SDE and SWE, respectively. Ecological risks in the majority of the study sites for the detected compounds were at low (RQ < 0.1) and medium levels (0.1 ≤ RQ < 1) for certain species of fish, Daphnia magna and algae. However, the cumulative RQs for all the compounds had ∑RQs ≥1 for most sites in both estuaries, indicating that these organisms, if present in both estuaries, may be exposed to potential ecological concerns due to accumulated OPFR chemicals. The scope of future studies should be broadened to include research areas that are not only focus on the bioaccumulation patterns of these compounds but also find sustainable ways to reduce them from these estuarine environments.
南非的河口对于生物多样性保护非常重要,并且是休闲和旅游活动的焦点。这些水生系统中的有机磷阻燃剂 (OPFRs) 水平在目前的研究中尚未得到记录。由于南非河口的持久性有机污染物的负面影响,我们通过研究两种河口沉积物中 8 种 OPFRs 的时空分布、季节变化和生态风险,来检测其存在情况。半城市化农业周边系统的桑兹河口(SDE)记录的沉积物中∑OPFR 浓度范围为 0.71 至 22.5ng/gdw,而城市化程度较高的斯瓦特克普斯河口(Swartkops Estuary)记录的浓度范围为 0.61 至 119ng/gdw。与氯代和芳基相比,烷基-OPFRs 是两个河口的主要同系物。在同系物组中,TBP、TCPP 和 TCrP 是最丰富的化合物。两个河口均没有明显的季节性∑OPFR 浓度趋势,夏季和秋季分别记录了 SDE 和 SWE 中的最高浓度。在所研究的大部分地点,对于所检测到的化合物,生态风险处于低水平(RQ<0.1)和中水平(0.1≤RQ<1),对于某些鱼类、大型溞和藻类而言。然而,对于两个河口的大多数地点,所有化合物的累积 RQ 值∑RQs≥1,这表明如果这些有机体能存在于两个河口,它们可能会因积累的 OPFR 化学物质而面临潜在的生态问题。未来的研究范围应该扩大,不仅要包括这些化合物的生物积累模式研究,还要找到从这些河口环境中减少它们的可持续方法。