Marc Manon, Rambourg Patrick, Bussières Jean-François
Unité de recherche en pratique pharmaceutique, département de pharmacie, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, H3T 1C5 Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Conseil central H de l'Ordre national des pharmaciens, 4, avenue Ruysdaël, 75379 Paris, France.
Ann Pharm Fr. 2024 May;82(3):560-574. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
To ensure compliance with the legal and normative framework, the professional orders, which supervise the practice of pharmacy have established a professional inspection process. In addition to this process, other external organizations also require an accreditation, authorization, certification or validation process for professional practices.
The main objective is to identify and compare the methods of evaluating pharmaceutical practice in hospitals in France and Quebec.
In order to identify and compare the methods of evaluating pharmaceutical practice in hospitals in France and Quebec, our approach allowed us to identify more organizations in France (i.e., High Authority of Health, Regional Health Agencies, the National Order of Pharmacists, the Nuclear Safety Agency, the Biomedicine Agency and the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products) than in Quebec (i.e., Accreditation Canada, Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec and Health Canada). The study highlights the legal framework and applicable standards, the surveyors, the evaluation methods and the particularities for the evaluation of the hospital, the pharmacy department and the members of the department.
This study highlights the evaluation processes of pharmaceutical practice in hospitals. In France, as in Quebec, we recognize the importance of the drug circuit in the hospital, the development and operation of a pharmacy department and the practice of pharmacy. While there are more similarities for the assessment of the drug circuit in hospitals and pharmacy department, important differences are observed for the assessment of individuals. We believe that the publication of a comparative analysis can contribute to discussions and exchanges to benefit from the best practices of each country.
为确保符合法律和规范框架,监管药学实践的专业协会已建立专业检查流程。除该流程外,其他外部组织也要求对专业实践进行认证、授权、鉴定或验证流程。
主要目的是识别和比较法国和魁北克医院药学实践的评估方法。
为识别和比较法国和魁北克医院药学实践的评估方法,我们的方法使我们识别出法国有更多组织(即法国卫生高级管理局、地区卫生机构、国家药剂师协会、核安全局、生物医学局以及国家药品和健康产品安全局),而魁北克有(即加拿大认证协会、魁北克药剂师协会和加拿大卫生部)。该研究突出了法律框架和适用标准、调查员、评估方法以及医院、药房部门和部门成员评估的特殊性。
本研究突出了医院药学实践的评估流程。在法国和魁北克一样,我们认识到医院药品流通、药房部门的发展和运营以及药学实践的重要性。虽然医院和药房部门药品流通评估有更多相似之处,但在个人评估方面存在重要差异。我们认为发表比较分析有助于讨论和交流,以借鉴各国的最佳实践。