Department of Critical Care Medicine, Meizhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Meizhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Feb 17;29(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01724-8.
The optimal blood glucose (BG) level for patients with cardiogenic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear. Studies have found that both excessively high and low BG levels contribute to adverse cardiovascular events. Our study aims to investigate the optimal BG level for critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock and evaluate the effects of optimal BG on the prognosis of patients.
A total of 2013 patients with cardiogenic shock obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database were included in the final cohort for our retrospective observational study for data analysis. The exposure was time-weighted average BG (TWA-BG), which was calculated by the time-series BG records and corresponding time stamps of patients with cardiogenic shock during their stay in the ICU. The cut-off value of TWA-BG was identified by the restricted cubic spline curve and included patients were categorized into three groups: low TWA-BG group (TWA-BG ≤ 104 mg/dl), optimal TWA-BG group (104 < TWA-BG ≤ 138 mg/dl), and high TWA-BG group (TWA-BG > 138 mg/dl). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were ICU and in-hospital mortality. We performed the log-rank test to detect whether there is a difference in mortality among different groups in the original cohort. Multiple distinct models were employed to validate the robustness of the results.
Our study revealed that the optimal BG level for critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock is 104-138 mg/dl. Compared to the optimal TWA-BG group, the low TWA-BG group (hazard ratio (HR): 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.33, p = 0.002) and high TWA-BG group (HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.46-2.03, p < 0.001) exhibited higher 28-day mortality. Similarly, the low TWA-BG group and high TWA-BG group demonstrated higher risks in terms of ICU mortality (low TWA-BG group: HR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.40-3.79, p < 0.001; high TWA-BG group: HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.45-2.17, p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (low TWA-BG group: HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.19-2.51, p = 0.001; high TWA-BG group: HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.38-1.95, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis conducted through propensity score matching and the subgroup analysis further substantiated the robustness of the results.
The optimal BG level for patients with cardiogenic shock is 104-138 mg/dl. BG levels below 104 mg/dl and above 138 mg/dl were associated with a less favorable prognosis.
重症监护病房(ICU)心源性休克患者的最佳血糖(BG)水平仍不清楚。研究发现,过高和过低的 BG 水平都会导致不良心血管事件。我们的研究旨在探讨心源性休克危重症患者的最佳 BG 水平,并评估最佳 BG 对患者预后的影响。
本研究最终纳入了来自 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV 数据库的 2013 例心源性休克患者进行回顾性观察性研究。暴露因素为时间加权平均 BG(TWA-BG),通过患者在 ICU 期间的 BG 记录和相应的时间戳计算得出。通过受限立方样条曲线确定 TWA-BG 的截断值,并将患者分为三组:低 TWA-BG 组(TWA-BG≤104mg/dl)、最佳 TWA-BG 组(104< TWA-BG≤138mg/dl)和高 TWA-BG 组(TWA-BG>138mg/dl)。主要结局为 28 天死亡率,次要结局为 ICU 死亡率和住院死亡率。我们使用对数秩检验来检测原始队列中不同组之间的死亡率是否存在差异。采用多种不同的模型来验证结果的稳健性。
我们的研究表明,心源性休克危重症患者的最佳 BG 水平为 104-138mg/dl。与最佳 TWA-BG 组相比,低 TWA-BG 组(风险比(HR):1.67,95%置信区间(CI):1.19-2.33,p=0.002)和高 TWA-BG 组(HR:1.72,95% CI:1.46-2.03,p<0.001)的 28 天死亡率更高。同样,低 TWA-BG 组和高 TWA-BG 组的 ICU 死亡率(低 TWA-BG 组:HR:2.30,95% CI:1.40-3.79,p<0.001;高 TWA-BG 组:HR:1.77,95% CI:1.45-2.17,p<0.001)和住院死亡率(低 TWA-BG 组:HR:1.73,95% CI:1.19-2.51,p=0.001;高 TWA-BG 组:HR:1.64,95% CI:1.38-1.95,p<0.001)更高。通过倾向评分匹配和亚组分析进行的敏感性分析进一步证实了结果的稳健性。
心源性休克患者的最佳 BG 水平为 104-138mg/dl。BG 水平低于 104mg/dl 和高于 138mg/dl 与预后较差相关。