Cleveland Clinic Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue/J2-4, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic Critical Care Department, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 May 4;12(5):328-335. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad032.
Hyperglycaemia has been an established predictor of poor outcomes in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to assess the pattern of early glycemic control in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) on temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and its impact on short-term outcomes.
All adult patients admitted to the Cleveland clinic cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) between 2015 and 2019 with CS necessitating MCS with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella or venous arterial- extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA- ECMO) exclusively for CS were retrospectively analyzed. Blood glucose values were collected for the first 72 h from the time of MCS insertion. Patients were categorized into three groups [group 1 = mean blood glucose (MBG) < 140, group 2 = MBG between 140 and 180, and group 3 = MBG >180]. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. A total of 393 patients with CS on temporary MCS [median age (Q1, Q3), 63 (54, 70), 42% females], were admitted to our CICU during the study period. Of these, 144 patients (37%) were on IABP, 121 patients (31%) were on Impella, and 128 (32%) were on VA-ECMO. Upon stratifying the patients into groups depending on MBG during the initial time period after MCS placement, 174 patients (44%) had MBG less than 140 mg/dL, 126 patients (32%) had MBG between 140 and 180 mg/dL whereas 93 (24%) patients had MBG > 180 mg/dL. Overall, patients on IABP had the best glycemic control during the early period whereas those on ECMO had the highest MBG during the initial timeframe. A comparison of 30-day mortality revealed that patients with MBG >180 mg/dL had worse outcomes compared to the other two groups (P = 0.005). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that hyperglycaemia was an independent predictor of poor outcomes in CS patients on MCS when undifferentiated by device type (aOR 2.27, 95% CI 1.19-4.42, P = 0.01). However, upon adjusting for the type of MCS device, this effect was no longer present.
A significant proportion of patients with CS on MCS manifest early hyperglycaemia regardless of diabetic status. The presence of early hyperglycaemia in these patients acted predominantly as a surrogate of the underlying shock severity and was associated with worse short-term outcomes. Future studies should assess whether strategies to optimize glycemic control in this high-risk cohort can independently improve clinical outcomes.
高血糖已被确立为危重症患者预后不良的预测因素。本研究旨在评估在接受主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)、Impella 或静脉动脉-体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)等临时机械循环支持(MCS)治疗的心源性休克(CS)患者中,早期血糖控制的模式及其对短期结局的影响。
回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在克利夫兰诊所心脏重症监护病房(CICU)因 CS 需要 MCS 且仅因 CS 而使用 IABP、Impella 或 VA-ECMO 的所有成年患者。从 MCS 插入后的前 72 小时收集血糖值。患者分为三组[组 1 = 平均血糖(MBG)<140,组 2 = MBG 为 140 至 180,组 3 = MBG>180]。主要结局为 30 天全因死亡率。在研究期间,共有 393 名 CS 患者在临时 MCS 上[中位数(Q1,Q3),63(54,70),42%为女性]入住 CICU。其中,144 名患者(37%)使用 IABP,121 名患者(31%)使用 Impella,128 名患者(32%)使用 VA-ECMO。根据 MCS 放置后初始时间段内的 MBG 将患者分层为不同组后,174 名患者(44%)的 MBG 低于 140mg/dL,126 名患者(32%)的 MBG 为 140 至 180mg/dL,而 93 名患者(24%)的 MBG>180mg/dL。总体而言,IABP 组患者在早期血糖控制最佳,而 ECMO 组患者在初始时间内的 MBG 最高。30 天死亡率的比较显示,MBG>180mg/dL 的患者与其他两组相比预后更差(P=0.005)。多变量逻辑回归显示,在未按设备类型区分的情况下,高血糖是 CS 患者 MCS 预后不良的独立预测因素(优势比 2.27,95%置信区间 1.19-4.42,P=0.01)。然而,在调整 MCS 设备类型后,这种影响不再存在。
无论是否存在糖尿病,接受 MCS 的 CS 患者中有相当一部分患者会出现早期高血糖。这些患者的早期高血糖主要表现为潜在休克严重程度的替代指标,与短期预后不良相关。未来的研究应评估在这一高危患者群体中优化血糖控制的策略是否可以独立改善临床结局。