Suppr超能文献

LDBio 曲霉 ICT 侧向流检测法诊断成人哮喘变应性支气管肺曲霉病的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of LDBio Aspergillus ICT lateral flow assay for diagnosing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in adult asthmatics.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2024 Feb;67(2):e13700. doi: 10.1111/myc.13700.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG estimation is crucial for diagnosing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). A point-of-care LDBio immunochromatographic lateral flow assay (LFA) had 0%-90% sensitivity to detect IgG/IgM antibodies against A. fumigatus.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of LDBio-LFA in diagnosing ABPA, using the modified ISHAM-ABPA working group criteria as the reference standard. The secondary objective was to compare the diagnostic performance between LDBio-LFA and A. fumigatus-specific IgG (cut-offs, 27 and 40 mgA/L), using a multidisciplinary team (blinded to A. fumigatus-IgG and LDBio-LFA results) diagnosis of ABPA as the reference standard.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled adult subjects with asthma and ABPA. We performed the LDBio-LFA per the manufacturer's recommendations. We used the commercially available automated fluorescent enzyme immunoassay for measuring serum A. fumigatus-specific IgG. We used the same serum sample to perform both index tests. The tests were performed by technicians blinded to the results of other tests and clinical diagnoses.

RESULTS

We included 123 asthmatic and 166 ABPA subjects, with a mean ± SD age of 37.4 ± 14.4 years. Bronchiectasis and high-attenuation mucus were seen in 93.6% (146/156) and 24.3% (38/156) of the ABPA subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of LDBio-LFA in diagnosing ABPA were 84.9% and 82.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of serum A. fumigatus-specific IgG ≥27 mgA/L was 13% better than LDBio-LFA, with no difference in specificity. There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between LDBio-LFA and serum A. fumigatus-IgG ≥40 mgA/L.

CONCLUSION

LDBio-LFA is a valuable test for diagnosing ABPA. However, a negative test should be confirmed using an enzyme immunoassay.

摘要

背景

曲霉特异性 IgG 估测对于诊断变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)至关重要。即时护理 LDBio 免疫层析侧向流动检测(LFA)对检测针对烟曲霉的 IgG/IgM 抗体具有 0%-90%的敏感性。

目的

使用改良的 ISHAM-ABPA 工作组标准作为参考标准,评估 LDBio-LFA 在诊断 ABPA 中的准确性。次要目标是使用多学科团队(对烟曲霉-IgG 和 LDBio-LFA 结果均不知情)诊断的 ABPA 作为参考标准,比较 LDBio-LFA 与烟曲霉特异性 IgG(切点为 27 和 40mgA/L)之间的诊断性能。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了患有哮喘和 ABPA 的成年患者。我们按照制造商的建议进行 LDBio-LFA。我们使用市售的自动荧光酶免疫测定法测量血清中烟曲霉特异性 IgG。我们使用相同的血清样本进行两项指标检测。检测由对其他检测和临床诊断结果均不知情的技术人员进行。

结果

我们纳入了 123 例哮喘患者和 166 例 ABPA 患者,平均年龄为 37.4±14.4 岁。156 例 ABPA 患者中有 93.6%(146/156)出现支气管扩张,24.3%(38/156)出现高衰减黏液。LDBio-LFA 诊断 ABPA 的敏感性和特异性分别为 84.9%和 82.9%。血清烟曲霉特异性 IgG≥27mgA/L 的敏感性比 LDBio-LFA 高 13%,但特异性无差异。LDBio-LFA 与血清烟曲霉-IgG≥40mgA/L 的敏感性和特异性均无显著差异。

结论

LDBio-LFA 是诊断 ABPA 的有价值的检测方法。然而,阴性检测结果应使用酶免疫测定法进行确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验