Suppr超能文献

高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中左心室射血分数的预测因素

Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

作者信息

Panoulas Vasileios F, Escaned Javier, Hill Jonathan M, Barker Erin, Butler Karin, Almedhychy Ali, Tsintzos Stelios I, O'Neill William W

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 2;11:1342409. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342409. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Revascularization completeness after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support [intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella] is used during high-risk PCI (HR-PCI) to enhance peri-procedural safety and achieve more complete revascularization. The relationship between revascularization completeness [post-PCI residual SYNTAX Score (rSS)] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in HR-PCI has not been established. We investigated LVEF predictors at 90 days post-PCI with Impella or IABP support. Individual patient data (IPD) were analyzed from PROTECT II (NCT00562016) in the base case. IPD from PROTECT II and RESTORE-EF (NCT04648306) were naïvely pooled in the sensitivity analysis. Using complete cases only, linear regression was used to explore the predictors of LVEF at 90 days post-PCI. Models were refined using stepwise selection based on Akaike Information Criterion and included: treatment group (Impella, IABP), baseline characteristics [age, gender, race, New York Heart Association Functional Classification, LVEF, SYNTAX Score (SS)], and rSS. Impella treatment and higher baseline LVEF were significant predictors of LVEF improvement at 90 days post-PCI ( ≤ 0.05), and a lower rSS contributed to the model ( = 0.082). In the sensitivity analysis, Impella treatment, higher baseline LVEF, and lower rSS were significant predictors of LVEF improvement at 90 days ( ≤ 0.05), and SS pre-PCI contributed to the model ( = 0.070). Higher baseline LVEF, higher SS pre-PCI, lower rSS (i.e. completeness of revascularization), and Impella treatment were predictors of post-PCI LVEF improvement. The findings suggest potential mechanisms of Impella include improving the extent and quality of revascularization, and intraprocedural ventricular unloading.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的血管再通完整性与改善长期预后相关。在高危PCI(HR-PCI)期间使用机械循环支持[主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)或Impella]以提高围手术期安全性并实现更完全的血管再通。HR-PCI中血管再通完整性[PCI术后残余SYNTAX评分(rSS)]与左心室射血分数(LVEF)之间的关系尚未明确。我们研究了在Impella或IABP支持下PCI术后90天时LVEF的预测因素。在基础病例中分析了来自PROTECT II(NCT00562016)的个体患者数据(IPD)。在敏感性分析中,将来自PROTECT II和RESTORE-EF(NCT04648306)的IPD进行了简单合并。仅使用完整病例,采用线性回归来探索PCI术后90天时LVEF的预测因素。基于赤池信息准则使用逐步选择对模型进行优化,模型包括:治疗组(Impella、IABP)、基线特征[年龄、性别、种族、纽约心脏协会心功能分级、LVEF、SYNTAX评分(SS)]和rSS。Impella治疗和较高的基线LVEF是PCI术后90天时LVEF改善的显著预测因素(≤0.05),较低的rSS对模型有贡献(=0.082)。在敏感性分析中,Impella治疗、较高的基线LVEF和较低的rSS是90天时LVEF改善的显著预测因素(≤0.05),PCI术前SS对模型有贡献(=0.070)。较高的基线LVEF、较高的PCI术前SS、较低的rSS(即血管再通的完整性)和Impella治疗是PCI术后LVEF改善的预测因素。这些发现提示Impella的潜在机制包括改善血管再通的程度和质量以及术中减轻心室负荷。

相似文献

1
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 2;11:1342409. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342409. eCollection 2024.
9
Improvement in left ventricular function following higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):764-770. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28557. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Ejection Fraction Improvement Following Contemporary High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: RESTORE EF Study Results.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella: Principles, Evidence, and Daily Practice.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4586. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164586.

本文引用的文献

1
Ejection Fraction Improvement Following Contemporary High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: RESTORE EF Study Results.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
5
Optimized patient selection in high-risk protected percutaneous coronary intervention.
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Dec 8;24(Suppl J):J4-J10. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac060. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Defining the optimal revascularization strategy during protected high-risk procedures with Impella.
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Dec 8;24(Suppl J):J25-J29. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac062. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
A Review of the Impella Devices.
Interv Cardiol. 2022 Apr 8;17:e05. doi: 10.15420/icr.2021.11. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Acute coronary syndromes: summary of updated NICE guidance.
BMJ. 2021 Jan 15;372:m4760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4760.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验