• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数的改善:RESTORE EF研究结果

Ejection Fraction Improvement Following Contemporary High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: RESTORE EF Study Results.

作者信息

Wollmuth Jason, Patel Mitul P, Dahle Thom, Bharadwaj Aditya, Waggoner Thomas E, Chambers Jeffrey W, Ruiz-Rodriguez Ernesto, Mahmud Ehtisham, Thompson Craig, Morris D Lynn

机构信息

Providence Heart and Vascular Institute, Portland, Oregon.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, UC San Diego Health System, La Jolla, California.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350
PMID:39131473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite many reports of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with hemodynamic support, little is known about whether this approach improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The purpose of the present observational study was to examine, in an ideal patient population with Impella-supported HRPCI, whether there is an impact on left ventricular function at midterm follow-up.

METHODS

RESTORE EF is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected observational data set that aimed to assess 90-day LVEF in patients undergoing Impella-supported nonemergent HRPCI (NCT04648306), who survived with no intervening cardiac procedures prior to the primary endpoint follow-up window (90-day LVEF assessment). Secondary endpoints included change in New York Heart Association Functional Classification and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Grade at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

From August 2019 to May 2021, 406 patients were enrolled at 22 US sites. Age was 70.2 ​​± ​​11.4 ​​years; 26% were female. In paired assessment at 90-day follow-up, baseline LVEF improved from 35 ​​± ​​15% to 45 ​​± ​​14% ( = 251, < .0001), with significantly greater improvement in patients with residual SYNTAX score I of 0. Percentage classified as New York Heart Association class III/IV decreased from 62% at baseline to 15% at last follow-up ( < .001), and percentage with Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade III/IV symptoms decreased from 72% to 2% ( < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In an ideal cohort of HRPCI patients, there is a signal that hemodynamically supported HRPCI affords significant improvement in 90-day LVEF, with complete revascularization associated with greater LVEF improvement. These hypothesis-generating findings merit further assessment in large, all-comer studies and randomized trials.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多关于接受血流动力学支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HRPCI)患者临床结局的报道,但对于这种方法是否能改善左心室射血分数(LVEF)却知之甚少。本观察性研究的目的是在接受Impella支持的HRPCI的理想患者群体中,检查中期随访时对左心室功能是否有影响。

方法

RESTORE EF是一项对前瞻性收集的观察数据集进行的多中心回顾性分析,旨在评估接受Impella支持的非急诊HRPCI患者的90天LVEF(NCT04648306),这些患者在主要终点随访窗口(90天LVEF评估)之前未进行介入性心脏手术且存活。次要终点包括最后一次随访时纽约心脏协会功能分级和加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级的变化。

结果

2019年8月至2021年5月,美国22个地点招募了406例患者。年龄为70.2±11.4岁;26%为女性。在90天随访的配对评估中,基线LVEF从35±15%提高到45±14%(P = 251,P <.0001),残余SYNTAX评分为0的患者改善更为显著。纽约心脏协会III/IV级患者的比例从基线时的62%降至最后一次随访时的15%(P <.001),加拿大心血管学会III/IV级症状患者的比例从72%降至2%(P <.0001)。

结论

在理想的HRPCI患者队列中,有迹象表明血流动力学支持的HRPCI可使90天LVEF显著改善,完全血运重建与更大的LVEF改善相关。这些产生假设的发现值得在大型、所有患者参与的研究和随机试验中进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/1dc456231d1c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/a684824195e7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/a6559084eac4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/850e8f64c9b1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/ea61a02a5395/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/62c5412d07ce/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/1dc456231d1c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/a684824195e7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/a6559084eac4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/850e8f64c9b1/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/ea61a02a5395/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/62c5412d07ce/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54b6/11307872/1dc456231d1c/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Ejection Fraction Improvement Following Contemporary High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: RESTORE EF Study Results.当代高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数的改善:RESTORE EF研究结果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
2
Change in left ventricular function and outcomes following high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella-guided hemodynamic support.在使用Impella引导的血流动力学支持进行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室功能和结局的变化。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 5;11:1416613. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1416613. eCollection 2024.
3
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中左心室射血分数的预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 2;11:1342409. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342409. eCollection 2024.
4
Predictors and Prognostic Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery after Impella-Supported Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者在接受Impella支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室射血分数恢复的预测因素及预后影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 24;12(10):1576. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101576.
5
Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention. bailout 经皮心室辅助装置与非紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中预防性策略的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):E501-E512. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29758. Epub 2021 May 29.
6
Influence of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients undergoing contemporary pLVAD-supported high-risk PCI.接受当代左心室辅助装置支持的高危 PCI 患者的左心室射血分数的影响。
Am Heart J. 2024 Mar;269:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.015. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
Improvement in left ventricular function following higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室功能改善。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):764-770. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28557. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Sex Differences in pLVAD-Assisted High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROTECT III Study.左心室辅助装置支持下的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的性别差异:来自PROTECT III研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1721-1729. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.04.036. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
9
Impact of Impella protected-percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricle function recovery of patients with extensive coronary disease and poor left ventricular function.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合 Impella 对广泛病变伴左心功能不良患者左心室功能恢复的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;387:131098. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.048. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
10
[Clinical predictors of left ventricular function improvement after percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ejection fraction below 45%].[射血分数低于45%的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室功能改善的临床预测因素]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58(7-8):751-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.接受使用Impella进行的保护性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的特征与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038509. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Mechanical Circulatory Support With Impella in High-Risk Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion and Complex Multivessel Disease.在患有慢性完全闭塞和复杂多支血管疾病的高危患者中使用Impella进行机械循环支持。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;105(4):883-890. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31392. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
3
Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assistance in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Short-Term Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Culprit-Only Versus One-Stage Versus Multistage Revascularization.多支冠状动脉疾病非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的最佳血运重建策略:罪犯血管血运重建与一期/多期血运重建比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016575. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016575. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
Prognostic importance of culprit lesion location in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction.心肌梗死所致心源性休克中罪犯病变部位的预后重要性
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Mar 5;10(1):25–32. doi: 10.1177/2048872620911848. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的搏动性左心室辅助:短期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5357. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185357.
4
Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Complex High-Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Indications, Device Options, and Potential Complications.机械循环支持在复杂高危及有指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:当前适应证、设备选择及潜在并发症
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 21;13(16):4931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164931.
5
Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella: Principles, Evidence, and Daily Practice.使用Impella的机械循环支持:原理、证据及日常实践
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4586. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164586.
6
The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review.机械循环支持在择期高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:基于文献的综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 9;4(2):oeae007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中左心室射血分数的预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 2;11:1342409. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1342409. eCollection 2024.
8
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged mechanical circulatory support after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后需要长时间机械循环支持的患者的临床特征和结局。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jan 15;20(2):e135-e145. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00512.
9
Mechanical Support Strategies for High-Risk Procedures in the Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A State-of-the-Art Review.侵入性心脏导管实验室高风险手术的机械支持策略:最新综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 18;12(24):7755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247755.
10
Impella-Supported Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Aggressive Rotational Atherectomy for Heavily Calcified Lesions in Left Main Trunk Bifurcation in a Patient with Severe Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.在一名严重左心室收缩功能障碍患者的左主干分叉处重度钙化病变中,使用Impella支持的光学相干断层扫描引导下的积极旋磨术
Case Rep Cardiol. 2023 Aug 14;2023:6894610. doi: 10.1155/2023/6894610. eCollection 2023.
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.
多血管病变与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心原性休克。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 25;13(10):1171-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry.依帕伐保护下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中复杂高危和适应证患者的血运重建程度的长期结果:来自罗马-维罗纳注册研究的报告。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;2019:5243913. doi: 10.1155/2019/5243913. eCollection 2019.
5
Improvement in left ventricular function following higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.缺血性心肌病患者行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室功能改善。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):764-770. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28557. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Lesion Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的完全罪犯病变与罪犯病变介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 23;72(17):1989-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.089.
8
Meta-Analysis Comparing Complete or Culprit Only Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Disease Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.多血管病变合并心源性休克患者行完全血运重建或罪犯血管血运重建的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1661-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Patterns and temporal trends of comorbidity among adult patients with incident cardiovascular disease in the UK between 2000 and 2014: A population-based cohort study.2000 年至 2014 年期间英国新发生心血管疾病的成年患者合并症的模式和时间趋势:基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 6;15(3):e1002513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002513. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.新型经皮冠状动脉血运重建术治疗初发三血管病变患者的临床结局:SYNTAX II 研究 1 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3124-3134. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512.