Stephens Kari A, van Eeghen Constance, Zheng Zihan, Anastas Tracy, Ma Kris Pui Kwan, Prado Maria G, Clifton Jessica, Rose Gail, Mullin Daniel, Chan Kwun C G, Kessler Rodger
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 8:2024.02.07.24302481. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.07.24302481.
A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive practice-level, multi-staged practice transformation intervention aimed to increase behavioral health integration in primary care practices and improve patient outcomes. We examined association between the completion of intervention stages and patient outcomes across a heterogenous national sample of primary care practices.
Forty-two primary care practices across the U.S. with co-located behavioral health and 2,426 patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions completed surveys at baseline, midpoint and two year follow-up. Effects of the intervention on patient health and primary care integration outcomes were examined using multilevel mixed-effects models, while controlling for baseline outcome measurements.
No differences were found associated with the number of intervention stages completed in patient health outcomes were found for depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, pain interference, social function, patient satisfaction with care or medication adherence. The completion of each intervention stage was associated with increases in Practice Integration Profile (PIP) domain scores and were confirmed with modeling using multiple imputation for: Workflow 3.5 (95% CI: 0.9-6.1), Integration Methods 4.6 (95% CI: 1.5-7.6), Patient Identification 2.9 (95% CI: 0.9-5.0), and Total Integration 2.7 (95% CI: 0.7-4.7).
A practice-centric flexible practice transformation intervention improved integration of behavioral health in primary care across heterogenous primary care practices treating patients with multiple chronic conditions. Interventions that allow practices to flexibly improve care have potential to help complex patient populations. Future research is needed to determine how to best target patient health outcomes at a population level.
一项实用的整群随机对照试验,采用全面的实践层面、多阶段的实践转型干预措施,旨在增强初级保健机构中行为健康的整合,并改善患者预后。我们在一个全国性的初级保健机构异质样本中,研究了干预阶段的完成情况与患者预后之间的关联。
美国42家设有行为健康服务的初级保健机构以及2426名患有多种慢性医疗和行为健康疾病的患者在基线、中期和两年随访时完成了调查。使用多水平混合效应模型检验干预对患者健康和初级保健整合结果的影响,同时控制基线结果测量。
在抑郁症、焦虑症、疲劳、睡眠障碍、疼痛、疼痛干扰、社会功能、患者对护理的满意度或药物依从性等患者健康结局方面,未发现与完成的干预阶段数量相关的差异。每个干预阶段的完成都与实践整合概况(PIP)领域得分的增加相关,并通过多重填补建模得到证实:工作流程3.5(95%置信区间:0.9 - 6.1)、整合方法4.6(95%置信区间:1.5 - 7.6)、患者识别2.9(95%置信区间:0.9 - 5.0)和总体整合2.7(95%置信区间:0.7 - 4.7)。
以实践为中心的灵活实践转型干预改善了不同初级保健机构中行为健康在初级保健中的整合,这些机构治疗患有多种慢性病的患者。允许机构灵活改善护理的干预措施有潜力帮助复杂的患者群体。未来需要开展研究以确定如何在人群层面最佳地针对患者健康结局。