Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington (L.D.).
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (M.M., A.B., C.R.E., M.C.L., C.M., D.H.S., W.M.V.).
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jan;175(1):46-55. doi: 10.7326/M21-1436. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Chronic pain is common, disabling, and costly. Few clinical trials have examined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions embedded in primary care settings to improve chronic pain among those receiving long-term opioid therapy.
To determine the effectiveness of a group-based CBT intervention for chronic pain.
Pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02113592).
Kaiser Permanente health care systems in Georgia, Hawaii, and the Northwest.
Adults (aged ≥18 years) with mixed chronic pain conditions receiving long-term opioid therapy.
A CBT intervention teaching pain self-management skills in 12 weekly, 90-minute groups delivered by an interdisciplinary team (behaviorist, nurse, physical therapist, and pharmacist) versus usual care.
Self-reported pain impact (primary outcome, as measured by the PEGS scale [pain intensity and interference with enjoyment of life, general activity, and sleep]) was assessed quarterly over 12 months. Pain-related disability, satisfaction with care, and opioid and benzodiazepine use based on electronic health care data were secondary outcomes.
A total of 850 patients participated, representing 106 clusters of primary care providers (mean age, 60.3 years; 67.4% women); 816 (96.0%) completed follow-up assessments. Intervention patients sustained larger reductions on all self-reported outcomes from baseline to 12-month follow-up; the change in PEGS score was -0.434 point (95% CI, -0.690 to -0.178 point) for pain impact, and the change in pain-related disability was -0.060 point (CI, -0.084 to -0.035 point). At 6 months, intervention patients reported higher satisfaction with primary care (difference, 0.230 point [CI, 0.053 to 0.406 point]) and pain services (difference, 0.336 point [CI, 0.129 to 0.543 point]). Benzodiazepine use decreased more in the intervention group (absolute risk difference, -0.055 [CI, -0.099 to -0.011]), but opioid use did not differ significantly between groups.
The inclusion of only patients with insurance in large integrated health care systems limited generalizability, and the clinical effect of change in scores is unclear.
Primary care-based CBT, using frontline clinicians, produced modest but sustained reductions in measures of pain and pain-related disability compared with usual care but did not reduce use of opioid medication.
National Institutes of Health.
慢性疼痛很常见,且会导致身体残疾和经济损失。很少有临床试验研究过将认知行为疗法(CBT)干预措施嵌入初级保健环境中,以改善长期接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性疼痛患者的状况。
评估一种基于小组的 CBT 干预措施对慢性疼痛的疗效。
实用、群组随机对照试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02113592)。
佐治亚州、夏威夷州和西北部的 Kaiser Permanente 医疗保健系统。
接受长期阿片类药物治疗、患有混合性慢性疼痛疾病的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)。
由跨学科团队(行为学家、护士、物理治疗师和药剂师)每周进行 12 次、每次 90 分钟的 CBT 干预,教授疼痛自我管理技能,与常规护理相比。
自我报告的疼痛影响(主要结局,通过 PEGS 量表[疼痛强度和对生活享受、一般活动和睡眠的干扰]评估)在 12 个月内每季度评估一次。疼痛相关残疾、护理满意度以及基于电子医疗保健数据的阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物使用情况为次要结局。
共有 850 名患者参与,代表 106 个初级保健提供者群组(平均年龄 60.3 岁;67.4%为女性);816 名(96.0%)完成了随访评估。干预组患者从基线到 12 个月随访的所有自我报告结局均有更大程度的改善;PEG 评分的变化为-0.434 分(95%置信区间,-0.690 至-0.178 分),疼痛相关残疾的变化为-0.060 分(CI,-0.084 至-0.035 分)。在 6 个月时,干预组患者报告对初级保健(差异 0.230 分[CI,0.053 至 0.406 分])和疼痛服务(差异 0.336 分[CI,0.129 至 0.543 分])的满意度更高。苯二氮䓬类药物的使用在干预组中减少更多(绝对风险差异,-0.055[CI,-0.099 至-0.011]),但阿片类药物的使用两组间无显著差异。
仅纳入有保险的患者参加大型综合医疗保健系统限制了研究的普遍性,且评分变化的临床效果尚不清楚。
与常规护理相比,基于初级保健的 CBT 使用一线临床医生,在疼痛和疼痛相关残疾方面产生了适度但持续的降低,但并未减少阿片类药物的使用。
美国国立卫生研究院。