Suppr超能文献

中国西部农村地区新冠疫情期间汉族与少数民族防护行为的差距:分解分析

Gap in protective behaviors between Han and minority ethnicities during COVID-19 pandemic in rural western China: A decomposition analysis.

作者信息

Ye Ruixue, Wu Yuju, Sun Chang, Wang Qingzhi, Ma Yue, Chen Yunwei, Pappas Lucy, Feng Cindy, Rozelle Scott, Zhou Huan

机构信息

West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Stanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 28;39:102617. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102617. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Understanding the ethnic gap in protective behavior and its explanatory factors is a promising step for reducing pandemic-induced disparities. However, no studies have endeavored to identify the factors contributing to a gap in protective behaviors between Han and minority ethnicities during COVID-19 pandemic in rural China. We aimed to analyze the gap in protective behaviors between Han and minority residents in rural China. We conducted cross-sectional studies in multi-ethnic rural China in 2020. A total of 1640 participants from Han and minority groups were invited to participate. The decomposition method was applied to analyze the gap in protective behaviors and its associated factors between the Han and minority groups. Participants in the Han group had a higher protective behavioral score (9.26 ± 1.20) than the minority group (8.97 ± 1.50), yielding a significant gap in protective behaviors between Han and minority ethnicities of 0.29. Socio-demographic characteristics, health status, the degree of knowledge held about COVID-19, and psychological responses to COVID-19 explained 79.3 % (0.23/0.29) of the behavioral gap between the Han and minority groups. The difference in household asset levels was the largest explained contributor to the behavioral gap (52.17 %) (0.12/0.23), followed by fear felt for COVID-19 (-21.74 %) (-0.05/0.23). Differences in educational attainment, degree of knowledge held about COVID-19, and self-efficacy in response to COVID-19 each explained 17.4 % (0.04/0.23) of the behavioral gap. In conclusion, Han group show greater protective behaviors than minority ethnic groups. To drive better protective behavior in the most vulnerable communities, targeted, group-specific COVID-19 preventative messages deployed in public health communication strategies is suggested to enhance individual confidence in coping with the pandemic while creating a healthy amount of fear for public health crisis.

摘要

了解保护行为方面的种族差异及其解释因素是减少疫情引发的不平等现象的一个有前景的举措。然而,尚无研究致力于确定中国农村地区在新冠疫情期间汉族与少数民族之间保护行为存在差距的影响因素。我们旨在分析中国农村地区汉族和少数民族居民在保护行为上的差距。2020年,我们在中国多民族农村地区开展了横断面研究。共邀请了1640名汉族和少数民族参与者。采用分解方法分析汉族和少数民族在保护行为上的差距及其相关因素。汉族参与者的保护行为得分(9.26±1.20)高于少数民族参与者(8.97±1.50),汉族和少数民族在保护行为上存在显著差距,为0.29。社会人口学特征、健康状况、对新冠疫情的了解程度以及对新冠疫情的心理反应解释了汉族和少数民族之间行为差距的79.3%(0.23/0.29)。家庭资产水平差异是行为差距的最大解释因素(52.17%)(0.12/0.23),其次是对新冠疫情的恐惧(-21.74%)(-0.05/0.23)。教育程度差异、对新冠疫情的了解程度以及应对新冠疫情的自我效能感分别解释了行为差距的17.4%(0.04/0.23)。总之,汉族群体比少数民族群体表现出更强的保护行为。为了在最脆弱的社区推动更好的保护行为,建议在公共卫生传播策略中部署有针对性的、针对特定群体的新冠疫情预防信息,以增强个人应对疫情的信心,同时对公共卫生危机产生适度的恐惧。

相似文献

1
3
4
Ethnic Disparities in Risk Factors for Myopia among Han and Minority Schoolchildren in Shawan, Xinjiang, China.
Optom Vis Sci. 2023 Jan 1;100(1):82-90. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001949. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Hygienic Risk Exposures Across Ethnic Groups in Rural Areas of Guangxi, China: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Perceptions of Policy.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Aug;8(4):1054-1066. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00862-z. Epub 2020 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of natural and anthropogenic drivers on plague risk in Southwest China: A multicenter cross-sectional study.
One Health. 2025 Jul 25;21:101142. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101142. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparity dashboards: an evaluation of the literature and framework for health equity improvement.
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Nov;5(11):e831-e839. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00150-4.
2
The Disparities on Loss of Employment Income by US Households During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Econ Race Policy. 2022;5(2):115-133. doi: 10.1007/s41996-021-00086-1. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
4
Gender inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Income, expenditure, savings, and job loss.
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105296. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105296. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Race/ethnicity, trust, and fear.
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2200-2207. doi: 10.1111/cts.13077. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
6
Knowledge and Determinants of Behavioral Responses to the Pandemic of COVID-19.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 9;8:673187. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.673187. eCollection 2021.
7
Structural Racism and the COVID-19 Experience in the United States.
Health Secur. 2021 Jun;19(S1):S14-S26. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0031. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About COVID-19 Among Adults in the United States.
Front Public Health. 2021 May 11;9:653498. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653498. eCollection 2021.
9
COVID-19 preventive behaviours in White British and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) people in the UK.
J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(6):1301-1317. doi: 10.1177/13591053211017208. Epub 2021 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验