Gadkaree Shekhar K, Derakhshan Adeeb, Nyabenda Victor, Ncogoza Isaie, Tuyishimire Gratien, Shaye David A
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Mar;17(1):13-17. doi: 10.1177/19433875221143605. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
Cadaveric investigation.
Rigid internal fixation (RIF) using plates and screws is often not feasible in low and middle-income countries due to limited resources. Interosseous wiring to achieve semi-rigid fixation is often used, but lacks biomechanical force data. Herein we aim to quantitatively compare interosseous wiring to RIF.
Cadaveric mandibles were fractured at the parasymphysis and angle. Fixation was achieved using interosseous wiring in both single wire loop and figure-of-eight formations, as well as plate and screw fixation (n = 5 for each fixation type at each fracture site). A force gauge was used to measure the number of Newtons (N) required to achieve diastasis and complete failure at the fixation site.
For angle fractures, the mean force required for initial diastasis was 4.1, 5.9, and 10.9 N for single wire, figure-of-eight wiring, and plating respectively ( < .001). Complete failure was achieved with 152.9, 168.9, and 237.6 N of force for the three methods, respectively ( < .001). Complete failure was achieved for parasymphyseal fractures with 197.7, 263.0, and 262.8 N of force for single wire, figure-of-eight wiring, and plating respectively ( = .002). Forces to achieve initial diastasis for parasymphyseal fractures were not statistically significant among the three fixation methods ( = .29).
Figure-of-eight interosseous wiring resists comparable forces across mandibular fractures compared to the gold standard of plating. In resource-limited settings when plates and screws are not available, this technique can be considered to achieve semi-rigid fixation of mandibular fractures.
尸体研究。
由于资源有限,在低收入和中等收入国家,使用钢板和螺钉进行坚固内固定(RIF)往往不可行。常采用骨间结扎来实现半坚固固定,但缺乏生物力学力数据。在此,我们旨在定量比较骨间结扎与坚固内固定。
在尸体下颌骨的颏孔旁和下颌角处造成骨折。分别采用单环和8字形骨间结扎以及钢板螺钉固定(每个骨折部位每种固定类型n = 5)。使用测力计测量在固定部位实现骨缝分离和完全断裂所需的牛顿数(N)。
对于下颌角骨折,单环结扎、8字形结扎和钢板固定实现初始骨缝分离所需的平均力分别为4.1 N、5.9 N和10.9 N(<0.001)。三种方法实现完全断裂所需的力分别为152.9 N、168.9 N和237.6 N(<0.001)。颏孔旁骨折采用单环结扎、8字形结扎和钢板固定实现完全断裂所需的力分别为197.7 N、263.0 N和262.8 N(=0.002)。三种固定方法实现颏孔旁骨折初始骨缝分离所需的力无统计学差异(=0.29)。
与钢板固定的金标准相比,8字形骨间结扎在抵抗下颌骨折方面的力相当。在资源有限的情况下,当无法获得钢板和螺钉时,可考虑采用该技术实现下颌骨折的半坚固固定。