Suppr超能文献

在现实生活中的在线超市中推动植物性肉类和奶制品替代品的选择:一项随机对照试验。

Nudging plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy in a real-life online supermarket: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

van der Vliet Nina, Stuber Josine M, Raghoebar Sanne, Roordink Eline, van der Swaluw Koen

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Tilburg University Graduate School, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5000 LE, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Appetite. 2024 May 1;196:107278. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107278. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

A shift from predominantly animal-based to plant-based consumption can benefit both planetary and public health. Nudging may help to promote such a shift. This study investigated nudge effects on plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy in an online supermarket. We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled real-life online supermarket trial. Each customer transaction was randomized to a control arm (regular online supermarket) or an intervention arm (addition of placement, hedonic property and dynamic social norm nudges promoting meat and dairy alternatives). Outcomes were the aggregate of meat and dairy alternative purchases (primary outcome), the number of meat purchases, dairy purchases, meat alternative purchases, and dairy alternative purchases (secondary), and retailer revenue (tertiary). Generalized linear mixed models with a Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyzed data included 8488 transactions by participants (n = 4,266 control arm, n = 4,222 intervention arm), out of which 2,411 (66%) were aged above 45 years, 5,660 (67%) were females, and 1,970 (23%) lived in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods. Intervention arm participants purchased 10% (IRR 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.23)) more meat and dairy alternatives and 16% (1.16 (0.99-1.36)) more meat alternatives than control arm participants, although these findings are not statistically significant. There was no difference in dairy alternative purchases (1.00 (0.90-1.10)). Intervention arm participants purchased 3% less meats (0.97 (0.93-1.02)) and 2% less dairy products (0.98 (0.95-1.02)) than control participants. Retailer revenue was not affected (0.98 (0.95-1.01)). Online nudging strategies alone did not lead to a statistically significant higher amount of plant-based purchases, but replication of this work is needed with increased study power. Future studies should also consider nudging strategies as part of a broader set of policies to promote plant-based purchases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on 14 of May 2022. ISRCTN16569242 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16569242).

摘要

从以动物性食物为主的消费模式向以植物性食物为主的消费模式转变,对地球和公众健康都有益。助推可能有助于促进这种转变。本研究调查了在线超市中助推对肉类和奶制品植物性替代品的影响。我们进行了一项双臂、平行组、随机对照的真实在线超市试验。每笔客户交易被随机分配到对照组(常规在线超市)或干预组(添加位置、享乐属性和动态社会规范助推,以推广肉类和奶制品替代品)。结果指标包括肉类和奶制品替代品购买总量(主要结果指标)、肉类购买量、奶制品购买量、肉类替代品购买量和奶制品替代品购买量(次要结果指标)以及零售商收入(第三结果指标)。采用具有康威 - 麦克斯韦泊松分布的广义线性混合模型来估计发病率比(IRR)。分析的数据包括参与者的8488笔交易(对照组n = 4266,干预组n = 4222),其中2411人(66%)年龄在45岁以上,5660人(67%)为女性,1970人(23%)生活在社会经济条件不利的社区。干预组参与者购买的肉类和奶制品替代品比对照组参与者多10%(IRR 1.10(95%CI 0.99 - 1.23)),肉类替代品多16%(1.16(0.99 - 1.36)),不过这些结果在统计学上并不显著。奶制品替代品购买量无差异(1.00(0.90 - 1.10))。干预组参与者购买的肉类比对照组参与者少3%(0.97(0.93 - 1.02)),奶制品少2%(0.98(0.95 - 1.02))。零售商收入未受影响(0.98(0.95 - 1.01))。仅靠在线助推策略并没有导致植物性食品购买量在统计学上显著增加,但需要以更大的研究效力重复此项工作。未来的研究还应将助推策略视为促进植物性食品购买的更广泛政策组合的一部分。试验注册:于2022年5月14日进行前瞻性注册。ISRCTN16569242(https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16569242)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验