Suppr超能文献

劳动力因素能解释资金投入与患者体验之间的关系吗?对英国初级医疗数据的中介效应分析。

Does workforce explain the relationship between funding and patient experience? A mediation analysis of primary care data in England.

作者信息

Salant Natasha, Massou Efthalia, Awan Hassan, Ford John Alexander

机构信息

Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e072498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072498.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether general practitioner (GP) workforce contributes to the link between practice funding and patient experience. Specifically, to determine whether increased practice funding is associated with better patient experience, and to what degree an increase in workforce accounts for this relationship.

SETTING

Primary care practice level analysis of workforce, funding and patient experience of all NHS practices in England.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The link between NHS-provided funding to general practice (payments per patient) and patient experience, as per the General Practice Patient Survey, was evaluated. Subsequently, mediation analysis, adjusted for covariates, was used to scrutinise the extent to which GP workforce accounts for this relationship (measured as the number of GPs per 10 000 patients).

PARTICIPANTS

We included all general practices in England for which there was relevant data for each primary variable. Atypical practices were excluded, such as those with a patient list size of 0 or where the workforce variable was recorded as being more than 3 SD from the mean. After exclusion, 6139 practices were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

We found that workforce (GPs per 10 000 population) significantly (p<0.001) acts as a mediator in the effect of practice funding on overall patient experience even after adjusting for rurality, sex and age, and deprivation. On average, the mediated effect constitutes 30% of the total effect of practice funding on patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in the number of doctors in primary care in England appears to be a mechanism through which augmented practice funding could positively impact patient experience. Policy initiatives targeting improved patient experience should prioritise considerations related to workforce and practice funding.

摘要

目的

确定全科医生(GP)劳动力是否有助于实践资金与患者体验之间的联系。具体而言,确定实践资金增加是否与更好的患者体验相关,以及劳动力增加在多大程度上解释了这种关系。

设置

对英格兰所有国民保健服务(NHS)实践的劳动力、资金和患者体验进行初级保健实践层面的分析。

主要和次要结果指标

根据全科医生患者调查,评估了NHS提供给全科医疗的资金(每位患者的支付)与患者体验之间的联系。随后,使用经协变量调整的中介分析来审查全科医生劳动力在多大程度上解释了这种关系(以每10000名患者的全科医生数量衡量)。

参与者

我们纳入了英格兰所有有每个主要变量相关数据的全科医疗实践。排除了非典型实践,如患者名单规模为0的实践或劳动力变量记录为比均值超过3个标准差的实践。排除后,最终分析纳入了6139个实践。

结果

我们发现,即使在调整了农村地区、性别、年龄和贫困程度之后,劳动力(每10000人口中的全科医生)在实践资金对总体患者体验的影响中仍显著(p<0.001)起到中介作用。平均而言,中介效应占实践资金对患者体验总效应的30%。

结论

英格兰初级保健中医生数量的增加似乎是实践资金增加能够对患者体验产生积极影响的一种机制。旨在改善患者体验的政策举措应优先考虑与劳动力和实践资金相关的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13b7/10882355/e02371024483/bmjopen-2023-072498f01.jpg

相似文献

3
Organising general practice for care homes: a multi-method study.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(11):1-68. doi: 10.3310/YNDV6358.
4
The use of locum doctors in the NHS: understanding and improving the quality and safety of care.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(37):1-266. doi: 10.3310/CXMK4017.
9
General practice managers' motivations for skill mix change in primary care: Results from a cross-sectional survey in England.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/13558196221117647. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care stability as a social determinant.
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 12;5:1646932. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1646932. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of primary care funding on health inequalities: an umbrella review.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Feb 28;26:e24. doi: 10.1017/S146342362500012X.
3
Relationship between the volume and type of appointments in general practice and patient experience: an observational study in England.
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):e375-e381. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0276. Print 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care workforce composition and population, professional, and system outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e307-e315. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0593. Print 2022 May.
4
Impact of primary care funding on patient satisfaction: a retrospective longitudinal study of English general practice, 2013-2016.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 28;71(702):e47-e54. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X714233. Print 2021 Jan.
9
Primary care supply and quality of care in England.
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 May;19(4):499-519. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0898-2. Epub 2017 May 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验