Salant Natasha, Massou Efthalia, Awan Hassan, Ford John Alexander
Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e072498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072498.
To determine whether general practitioner (GP) workforce contributes to the link between practice funding and patient experience. Specifically, to determine whether increased practice funding is associated with better patient experience, and to what degree an increase in workforce accounts for this relationship.
Primary care practice level analysis of workforce, funding and patient experience of all NHS practices in England.
The link between NHS-provided funding to general practice (payments per patient) and patient experience, as per the General Practice Patient Survey, was evaluated. Subsequently, mediation analysis, adjusted for covariates, was used to scrutinise the extent to which GP workforce accounts for this relationship (measured as the number of GPs per 10 000 patients).
We included all general practices in England for which there was relevant data for each primary variable. Atypical practices were excluded, such as those with a patient list size of 0 or where the workforce variable was recorded as being more than 3 SD from the mean. After exclusion, 6139 practices were included in the final analysis.
We found that workforce (GPs per 10 000 population) significantly (p<0.001) acts as a mediator in the effect of practice funding on overall patient experience even after adjusting for rurality, sex and age, and deprivation. On average, the mediated effect constitutes 30% of the total effect of practice funding on patient experience.
The increase in the number of doctors in primary care in England appears to be a mechanism through which augmented practice funding could positively impact patient experience. Policy initiatives targeting improved patient experience should prioritise considerations related to workforce and practice funding.
确定全科医生(GP)劳动力是否有助于实践资金与患者体验之间的联系。具体而言,确定实践资金增加是否与更好的患者体验相关,以及劳动力增加在多大程度上解释了这种关系。
对英格兰所有国民保健服务(NHS)实践的劳动力、资金和患者体验进行初级保健实践层面的分析。
根据全科医生患者调查,评估了NHS提供给全科医疗的资金(每位患者的支付)与患者体验之间的联系。随后,使用经协变量调整的中介分析来审查全科医生劳动力在多大程度上解释了这种关系(以每10000名患者的全科医生数量衡量)。
我们纳入了英格兰所有有每个主要变量相关数据的全科医疗实践。排除了非典型实践,如患者名单规模为0的实践或劳动力变量记录为比均值超过3个标准差的实践。排除后,最终分析纳入了6139个实践。
我们发现,即使在调整了农村地区、性别、年龄和贫困程度之后,劳动力(每10000人口中的全科医生)在实践资金对总体患者体验的影响中仍显著(p<0.001)起到中介作用。平均而言,中介效应占实践资金对患者体验总效应的30%。
英格兰初级保健中医生数量的增加似乎是实践资金增加能够对患者体验产生积极影响的一种机制。旨在改善患者体验的政策举措应优先考虑与劳动力和实践资金相关的因素。