• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会人口统计学因素对初级保健患者体验的影响:2011 年至 2017 年英格兰全科医生患者调查分析。

Sociodemographic inequalities in patients' experiences of primary care: an analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2011 and 2017.

机构信息

Senior Research Associate, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.

MPhil Student, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK; Resident Physician, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Jul;26(3):198-207. doi: 10.1177/1355819620986814. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1177/1355819620986814
PMID:33517786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8182330/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Younger people, minority ethnic groups, sexual minorities and people of lower socioeconomic status report poorer experiences of primary care. In light of NHS ambitions to reduce unwarranted variations in care, we aimed to investigate whether inequalities in patient experience of primary care changed between 2011 and 2017, using data from the General Practice Patient Survey in England.

METHODS

We considered inequalities in relation to age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, sexual orientation and geographical region across five dimensions of patient experience: overall experience, doctor communication, nurse communication, access and continuity of care. We used linear regression to explore whether the magnitude of inequalities changed between 2011 and 2017, using mixed models to assess changes within practices and models without accounting for practice to assess national trends.

RESULTS

We included 5,241,408 responses over 11 survey waves from 2011-2017. There was evidence that inequalities changed over time (p < 0.05 for 27/30 models), but the direction and magnitude of changes varied. Changes in gaps in experience ranged from a 1.6 percentage point increase for experience of access among sexual minorities, to a 5.6 percentage point decrease for continuity, where experience worsened for older ages. Inequalities in access in relation to socio-economic status remained reasonably stable for individuals attending the same GP practice; nationally inequalities in access increased 2.1 percentage points (p < 0.0001) between respondents living in more/less deprived areas, suggesting access is declining fastest in practices in more deprived areas.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been few substantial changes in inequalities in patient experience of primary care between 2011 and 2017.

摘要

目的

年轻人、少数族裔、性少数群体和社会经济地位较低的人群报告称,他们在初级保健方面的体验较差。鉴于国民保健制度有减少护理服务中不必要的差异的目标,我们旨在利用英格兰全科医生患者调查的数据,调查初级保健患者体验的不平等是否在 2011 年至 2017 年间发生了变化。

方法

我们考虑了在五个患者体验维度(总体体验、医生沟通、护士沟通、获得护理的机会和护理的连续性)方面,与年龄、性别、贫困程度、种族、性取向和地理位置相关的不平等。我们使用线性回归来探索 2011 年至 2017 年间不平等程度是否发生了变化,使用混合模型评估实践内的变化,并在不考虑实践的情况下评估国家趋势的模型。

结果

我们纳入了 2011-2017 年 11 次调查中的 5241408 个回应。有证据表明不平等状况随时间发生了变化(27/30 个模型的 p 值均<0.05),但变化的方向和幅度有所不同。体验差距的变化范围从性少数群体获得护理机会的体验增加 1.6 个百分点,到连续性的体验恶化 5.6 个百分点不等,年龄越大体验越差。同一全科医生就诊的患者中,社会经济地位与获得护理机会之间的不平等相对稳定;在来自较贫困/较富裕地区的受访者中,全国范围内获得护理机会的不平等增加了 2.1 个百分点(p<0.0001),这表明在较贫困地区的实践中,获得护理的机会下降最快。

结论

2011 年至 2017 年间,初级保健患者体验方面的不平等变化不大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/5a6a59a412b4/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/d2b9ba0de327/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/c9bb1f37d6dc/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/5a6a59a412b4/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/d2b9ba0de327/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/c9bb1f37d6dc/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee63/8182330/5a6a59a412b4/10.1177_1355819620986814-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic inequalities in patients' experiences of primary care: an analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2011 and 2017.社会人口统计学因素对初级保健患者体验的影响:2011 年至 2017 年英格兰全科医生患者调查分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Jul;26(3):198-207. doi: 10.1177/1355819620986814. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
The Use of Online Consultation Systems and Patient Experience of Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the General Practice Patient Survey.在线咨询系统的使用与基层医疗患者体验:基于全科医生患者调查的横断面分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e51272. doi: 10.2196/51272.
3
Ethnic inequalities in health-related quality of life among older adults in England: secondary analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.英格兰老年人健康相关生活质量的种族不平等:一项全国性横断面调查的二次分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e145-e154. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30287-5. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
5
Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.了解初级保健中患者体验的种族和其他社会人口学差异:来自英国全科医生患者调查的证据。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):21-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000088. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
6
Patient experience of access to primary care: identification of predictors in a national patient survey.患者对初级保健的体验:在全国患者调查中确定预测因素。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Aug 28;11:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-61.
7
Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.初级保健中患者体验的衡量指标是否应根据病例组合进行调整?来自英国全科医生患者调查的证据。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):634-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000737. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey.为什么英国患有多种疾病的患者在初级医疗保健中反馈的体验更差?来自全科医疗患者调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006172.
9
Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: a national survey.英国性少数群体的健康状况较差,医疗保健体验也更糟:一项全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2905-y. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Continuity of care in diverse ethnic groups: a general practice record study in England.不同族群中的连续照护:英格兰的一般医疗记录研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Mar 30;73(729):e257-e266. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0271. Print 2023 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing relational continuity in general practice-understanding who needs it, when, to what extent, how and why: a realist review protocol.在全科医疗中实施关系连续性——了解谁需要它、何时需要、需要到何种程度、如何以及为何需要:一项实在论综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 9;15(9):e104081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104081.
2
Patient satisfaction with general practice in Scotland 2011/12 to 2021/22.2011/12至2021/22年苏格兰患者对全科医疗的满意度。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0322095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322095. eCollection 2025.
3
Did a national extended access scheme translate to improvements in patient experience to GP services in England? A retrospective observational study using patient-level data from the English GP patient survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' experience of primary care: James Mackenzie Lecture 2017.患者的初级医疗体验:2017年詹姆斯·麦肯齐讲座
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):38-39. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700601.
2
Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data.一般实践中的连续性护理与因门诊护理敏感情况而住院的关联:基于常规收集的个人层面数据的横断面研究。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j84.
3
How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England.
一项全国性的扩大就医计划是否转化为英格兰全科医生服务中患者体验的改善?一项使用来自英国全科医生患者调查的患者层面数据的回顾性观察研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 8;25(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12447-9.
4
Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.增加初级医疗服务的可及性对公平的医疗服务的未来至关重要:利用流程可视化来理解英国国家政策的影响。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 27;4:1499847. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1499847. eCollection 2024.
5
Strengthening general practice will help improve longevity and could reduce health inequalities.加强全科医疗将有助于提高寿命,并可能减少健康不平等现象。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):86-89. doi: 10.3399/bjgp25X740757. Print 2025 Feb.
6
Health inequalities in cancer care: a literature review of pathways to diagnosis in the United Kingdom.癌症护理中的健康不平等:英国癌症诊断途径的文献综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 27;76:102864. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102864. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Inequalities in patients' experiences with cancer care: the role of economic and health literacy determinants.癌症护理中患者体验的不平等:经济和健康素养决定因素的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11174-x.
8
Using Routine Data to Improve Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health.利用常规数据改善女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的健康状况。
Interact J Med Res. 2024 May 1;13:e53311. doi: 10.2196/53311.
9
Does workforce explain the relationship between funding and patient experience? A mediation analysis of primary care data in England.劳动力因素能解释资金投入与患者体验之间的关系吗?对英国初级医疗数据的中介效应分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e072498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072498.
10
Cross-sectional analyses of online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering user characteristics in general practices of England in the years 2018-2020.2018-2020 年英格兰普通实践中在线预约挂号和重复处方订购用户特征的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e068627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068627.
全民健康系统如何减少不平等:来自英国的经验教训。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):637-43. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206742. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.各组织对患者调查的不同回应率会导致不公平的绩效比较吗?:来自英国癌症患者体验调查的证据。
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):45-54. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000457.
5
Accelerating Improvement and Narrowing Gaps: Trends in Patients' Experiences with Hospital Care Reflected in HCAHPS Public Reporting.加速改善与缩小差距:HCAHPS公开报告中所反映的患者住院护理体验趋势
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1850-67. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12305. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care.关于获得英国初级医疗服务的证据与说辞。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 31;350:h1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1513.
7
Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey.为什么英国患有多种疾病的患者在初级医疗保健中反馈的体验更差?来自全科医疗患者调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006172.
8
Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: a national survey.英国性少数群体的健康状况较差,医疗保健体验也更糟:一项全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):9-16. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2905-y. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.基层医疗总体满意度的驱动因素:来自英国全科医疗患者调查的证据。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1081-92. doi: 10.1111/hex.12081. Epub 2013 May 30.
10
Do English patients want continuity of care, and do they receive it?英国患者是否想要连续性护理,他们是否得到了这种护理?
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Aug;62(601):e567-75. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X653624.