中国上海新冠疫情封控期间方舱医院内的抑郁、焦虑、较低的睡眠质量及社会支持情况

Depression, anxiety, lower sleep quality and social support in square cabin hospitals during Shanghai's COVID-19 lockdown, China.

作者信息

Quan Li, Xu Shuyu, Xu Hao, Chen Feng, Wu Shengyong, Zhu Jiaqi, Liu Suxuan, Su Tong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Faculty of Psychology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 5;15:1339774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1339774. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate and compare the associated factors of depression, anxiety, and other psychological differences between patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 quarantined in square cabin hospitals (SCH) and isolation wards (IW) in China.

METHODS

Cluster sampling method was performed during Shanghai's Two-Month Lockdown in 2022. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D), 7-tiem Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) were used to investigate psychological differences.

RESULTS

The HADS-D and GAD-7 scores of SCH patients were significantly higher than those in IW (p < 0.001; p = 0.0295). Sleep latency (SCH-IW = -3.76, p < 0.001), sleep duration (SCH-IW = -2.22, p < 0.05), habitual sleep efficiency (SCH-IW = -4.11, p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (SCH-IW = -3.59, p < 0.001) and use of sleep medication (SCH-IW = -5.18, p < 0.001) of SCH patients were significantly worse. Depression was the main emotional problem of quarantined patients. Patients in SCH had lower social support. Sleep disorders and the lowest oxygen saturation ≤ 93% were risk factors for depression, while social support and child status were protective factors. Myalgia and constipation were risk factors for anxiety, while marital status was the protective factor.

CONCLUSION

Patients quarantined in SCH had higher risks of depression and anxiety, lower sleep quality and social support. Somatic discomfort and sleep disorders exacerbated depression and anxiety, which could be ameliorated by social support and taken into consideration in future SCH construction.

摘要

目的

调查并比较中国方舱医院(SCH)和隔离病房(IW)中2019冠状病毒病患者抑郁、焦虑的相关因素及其他心理差异。

方法

在2022年上海为期两个月的封控期间采用整群抽样法。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表抑郁分量表(HADS-D)、7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)来调查心理差异。

结果

方舱医院患者的HADS-D和GAD-7得分显著高于隔离病房患者(p < 0.001;p = 0.0295)。方舱医院患者的入睡潜伏期(方舱医院-隔离病房=-3.76,p < 0.001)、睡眠时间(方舱医院-隔离病房=-2.22,p < 0.05)、习惯性睡眠效率(方舱医院-隔离病房=-4.11,p < 0.001)、睡眠障碍(方舱医院-隔离病房=-3.59,p < 0.001)和助眠药物使用情况(方舱医院-隔离病房=-5.18,p < 0.001)显著更差。抑郁是隔离患者的主要情绪问题。方舱医院患者的社会支持较低。睡眠障碍和最低血氧饱和度≤93%是抑郁的危险因素,而社会支持和子女状况是保护因素。肌痛和便秘是焦虑的危险因素,而婚姻状况是保护因素。

结论

在方舱医院隔离的患者抑郁和焦虑风险更高,睡眠质量和社会支持较低。躯体不适和睡眠障碍加剧了抑郁和焦虑,社会支持可改善这些情况,在未来方舱医院建设中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fb/10875048/8ead5908184c/fpsyt-15-1339774-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索