Triglyceride-glucose index for predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with iliac artery stenosis after percutaneous intervention with stents.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index) for predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with iliac artery stenosis after percutaneous intervention with stents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects with iliac artery stenosis, who underwent an iliac stent intervention and were followed up for at least 2 years were included in the study. Subjects were grouped according to TyG index (Group A, TyG index ≤8.848; Group B 8.849 ≤TyG index ≤9.382 and Group C TyG index ≥9.383). The subject's baseline characteristics, blood parameters, claudication distance, Transatlantic Intersociety Consensus classification, target lesion localization, stent direction, number of stents that were applied, and stent type were noted. Pre- and 1st and 2nd-year post-procedure Rutherford statuses, ankle-brachial index, and stenosis degree were recorded. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), Group B and Group C were combined and compared with Group A.

RESULTS

In total, 255 subjects were evaluated (female, n=77-30.2%, male, n=178-69.8%). The mean age of the subjects was 66.00±10.00 years (range from 39 to 90 years). The pre-procedure Rutherford measurements were significantly different among the groups (p=0.001). The rates of mild claudication and resting pain in Group A were higher than those in Groups B and C. The rate of moderate claudication in Group C was higher than that in Groups A and B. The rate of severe claudication in Group B was higher than that in Groups A and C. One year after the procedure, there were more asymptomatic cases in Group A than in Groups B and C (p=0.001). The rate of mild claudication in Group C was lower than that in Groups A and B. The rate of moderate claudication in Group C was higher than that in Group A. The rate of severe claudication in Group C was higher than that in Groups A and B. Two years after the procedure, the Rutherford measurements and the rates of mild claudication in Groups A and B were higher than those in Group C. The rate of severe claudication in Group C was higher than that in Groups A and B (p=0.001). One year after the procedure, the computed tomography angiography (CTA) measurements and the rate of full patency in Group A were higher than that in Groups B and C. The rate of 0-50% stenosis in Group B was higher than that in Groups A and C. The rate of 50-70% stenosis in Group C was higher than that in Group A. Two years after the procedure, the CTA measurements and the rates of 70-99% stenosis and 100% occlusion in Group C were higher than those in Groups A and B. The TyG index has high specificity and NPV. However, specificity and PPV levels were found to be quite low.

CONCLUSIONS

The TyG index was found to be an easy-to-use marker for predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with iliac artery stenosis after percutaneous intervention with stents.