Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova.
Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, University of Turin, Turin.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2025 Jan 1;34(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001165. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
The main objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and compare the outcomes and complications of displaced closed tibial fractures in children treated by CRC (closed reduction and casting), elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) or external fixation (EF). One hundred twenty-three consecutive children were treated for displaced closed tibia shaft fracture from July 2014 and January 2020 at two different institutions. Seventy-five of them met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study: 30 (40%) patients were treated with CRC, 33 (44%) with ESIN, and 12 with EF (16%). All clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications were registered and compared. The three groups did not differ with regard to gender, affected side, fracture site and associated fibula fracture. The age at the time of treatment in the CRC group was statistically lower than in ESIN and EF groups (8.43 ± 3.52 years vs. 10.39 ± 2.56 years vs. 11.08 ± 3.55 years, respectively). Immobilization time and time to partial and total weight bearing were significantly reduced in ESIN and EF groups compared to CRC group ( P < 0.05). Overall, no statistically significant differences were found between the three groups regarding complication rate and clinical and radiographic outcomes between the three groups. However, in CRC group, 3 patients (10%) had secondary fracture displacement and underwent ESIN. Surgical treatment is not contraindicated in children with displaced tibia shaft fractures. EF and ESIN provide earlier mobilization and weight-bearing recovery than CRC. However, apart from that, nonoperative treatment was as efficacious as surgical treatment.
本研究的主要目的是回顾性评估和比较儿童移位闭合性胫骨骨折经闭合复位和石膏固定(CRS)、弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN)或外固定(EF)治疗的结果和并发症。2014 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月,在两家不同的机构,123 例连续儿童因移位闭合性胫骨骨干骨折接受治疗。其中 75 例符合纳入标准并纳入研究:30 例(40%)采用 CRS 治疗,33 例(44%)采用 ESIN 治疗,12 例采用 EF(16%)治疗。所有临床和影像学结果及并发症均进行登记和比较。三组患者在性别、患侧、骨折部位和合并腓骨骨折方面无差异。CRS 组患者的治疗年龄明显低于 ESIN 和 EF 组(8.43±3.52 岁比 10.39±2.56 岁比 11.08±3.55 岁)。ESIN 和 EF 组在固定时间、部分负重和完全负重时间上明显短于 CRS 组(P<0.05)。总体而言,三组患者在并发症发生率、临床和影像学结果方面无统计学差异。然而,在 CRS 组,3 例(10%)患者出现继发性骨折移位,行 ESIN 治疗。对于有移位的胫骨骨干骨折患儿,手术治疗并非禁忌证。EF 和 ESIN 比 CRS 更早地实现活动和负重恢复。但是,除了这些之外,非手术治疗与手术治疗同样有效。