Giannakopoulos Konstadena L, McCurdy Matthew P, Sklenar Allison M, Frankenstein Andrea N, Urban Levy Pauline, Leshikar Eric D
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brain Behav. 2024 Jan;14(1):e3380. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3380.
Retrieval practice has been shown to be an effective means of learning new information, a memory phenomenon known as the testing effect or the retrieval practice effect. Some work suggests that the magnitude of the testing effect can be enhanced when the test used for retrieval practice uses fewer cues to retrieve previously studied information. It is unclear, however, whether such testing benefits extend to peripheral contextual details associated with studied materials (e.g., location where stimuli appear, font color in which items are presented, etc.). In this experiment, we examine both item memory (i.e., memory for the studied items) and context memory under conditions where the intervening test offers fewer cues (i.e., lower constraint) compared to more cues (higher constraint) to better understand item and context memory testing effects.
Participants first studied word pairs presented in one of eight locations as well as in either red or green font color. Then, in the re-exposure phase, participants processed materials in two types of intervening tests (lower constraint and a higher constraint test) as well as in a restudy condition, before a final memory test.
For item memory, results showed that memory was better in the lower constraint testing condition compared to both the higher constraint testing condition as well as the restudy (control) condition. For context memory, results indicated improved memory for location context under lower constraint testing compared to both higher constraint testing and restudy conditions. There was no difference in memory, however, for color context across all conditions.
Overall, these findings suggest that providing fewer cues to aid retrieval in the intervening test can induce better memory for both items as well as some contextual details.
检索练习已被证明是学习新信息的有效手段,这是一种被称为测试效应或检索练习效应的记忆现象。一些研究表明,当用于检索练习的测试使用较少线索来检索先前学习的信息时,测试效应的程度可以得到增强。然而,尚不清楚这种测试益处是否扩展到与学习材料相关的外围情境细节(例如,刺激出现的位置、呈现项目的字体颜色等)。在本实验中,我们在中间测试提供较少线索(即较低约束)与较多线索(较高约束)的条件下,研究项目记忆(即对学习项目的记忆)和情境记忆,以更好地理解项目和情境记忆测试效应。
参与者首先学习以八种位置之一呈现的单词对,以及红色或绿色字体颜色的单词对。然后,在重新暴露阶段,参与者在最终记忆测试之前,在两种类型的中间测试(较低约束和较高约束测试)以及重新学习条件下处理材料。
对于项目记忆,结果表明,与较高约束测试条件以及重新学习(对照)条件相比,较低约束测试条件下的记忆更好。对于情境记忆,结果表明,与较高约束测试和重新学习条件相比,较低约束测试下对位置情境的记忆有所改善。然而,在所有条件下,颜色情境的记忆没有差异。
总体而言,这些发现表明,在中间测试中提供较少线索以帮助检索,可以诱导对项目以及一些情境细节的更好记忆。