• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经耻骨后尿道中段吊带置入术的自上而下与自下而上入路的结局评估。

Evaluation of Outcomes Between the Top-down Versus the Bottom-up Approach for Retropubic Midurethral Sling.

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Female Pelvic Medicine, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):849-854. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05731-5. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05731-5
PMID:38376548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11052804/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) placement is the gold standard for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in the USA. The procedure can be approached from either a top-down or a bottom-up direction, but there is a paucity of contemporary data regarding outcomes between these approaches. The aim of this study was to provide updated clinical outcomes data.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing the retropubic MUS procedure alone or at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair between 2010 and 2020 at a single academic medical center. The electronic medical record was used to extract demographic data, operative approach, and perioperative complications. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of any perioperative complication.

RESULTS

Of the 309 patients analyzed, 140 (45.3%) underwent top-down and 169 (54.7%) underwent bottom-up retropubic MUS placement. Patients undergoing top-down MUS placement were more likely to be older (mean age 58 vs 54, p=0.02), have a history of diabetes mellitus (20% vs 8.9%, p=0.004), and have had a prior hysterectomy (27% vs 16%, p=0.02). They were less likely to have a concurrent anterior (p<0.001) or posterior repair (p<0.001). Patients undergoing the top-down procedure were less likely to experience sling exposure (p=0.02); complications in the two groups were otherwise similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The top-down approach to retropubic MUS placement was associated with lower rates of mesh erosion in this population of patients. Neither approach is associated with an increased overall risk of complications or de novo overactive bladder symptoms.

摘要

介绍和假设

经耻骨后尿道中段吊带(MUS)放置是治疗美国压力性尿失禁的金标准。该手术可以从上到下或从下到上进行,但关于这两种方法的结果,目前的数据很少。本研究的目的是提供最新的临床结果数据。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2010 年至 2020 年期间在一家学术医疗中心单独或同时行经耻骨后 MUS 手术和盆腔器官脱垂修复术的女性。电子病历用于提取人口统计学数据、手术方法和围手术期并发症。主要结局是任何围手术期并发症的综合发生率。

结果

在分析的 309 名患者中,140 名(45.3%)行从上到下的耻骨后 MUS 放置,169 名(54.7%)行从下到上的耻骨后 MUS 放置。行从上到下 MUS 放置的患者更可能年龄较大(平均年龄 58 岁 vs 54 岁,p=0.02),有糖尿病病史(20% vs 8.9%,p=0.004),并曾行子宫切除术(27% vs 16%,p=0.02)。她们不太可能同时行前修补术(p<0.001)或后修补术(p<0.001)。行从上到下手术的患者更可能出现吊带暴露(p=0.02);但两组的并发症相似。

结论

在本患者人群中,经耻骨后 MUS 从上到下放置的方法与较低的网片侵蚀率相关。两种方法都不会增加总体并发症风险或新发膀胱过度活动症症状。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Outcomes Between the Top-down Versus the Bottom-up Approach for Retropubic Midurethral Sling.经耻骨后尿道中段吊带置入术的自上而下与自下而上入路的结局评估。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Apr;35(4):849-854. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05731-5. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
2
A randomized trial of retropubic vs single-incision sling among patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair.经阴道脱垂修复术的患者中经耻骨后与单切口吊带随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):261.e1-261.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 May 3.
3
Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.经阴道脱垂手术时预防性耻骨后吊带的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):471.e1-471.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.044. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.开放式 Burch 耻骨后悬吊术与经耻骨后尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的长期疗效和安全性比较——一项大型研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):593.e1-593.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.043. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术术后阴道网片暴露的预测因素:一项病例对照研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2947-2. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.VIGI-MESH 注册研究中 2682 例患者行经耻骨后与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术的严重并发症和复发情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):428.e1-428.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1241. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
7
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的经尿道中段吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
8
Incidence of Bladder Injury During Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement After Prior Burch Colpopexy.既往行Burch阴道悬吊术后耻骨后中段尿道吊带置入术中膀胱损伤的发生率。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;23(1):53-55. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000351.
9
Prophylactic midurethral sling insertion during transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery for advanced prolapse patients with high-risk predictors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence.在经阴道盆腔重建手术中,为具有术后新发压力性尿失禁高风险预测因素的晚期脱垂患者预防性置入中段尿道吊带。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1541-1549. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3787-z. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
Burch Retropubic Urethropexy Compared With Midurethral Sling With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.耻骨后尿道悬吊术与经阴道尿道中段吊带术联合骶棘韧带固定术的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):828-35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001651.

本文引用的文献

1
Urgency and urgency incontinence following stress urinary incontinence surgery: A review of evaluation and management.压力性尿失禁手术后的急迫性和急迫性尿失禁:评估与管理综述
Indian J Urol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):268-275. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_147_22. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Sexual Disorders in Women with Overactive Bladder and Urinary Stress Incontinence Compared to Controls: A Prospective Study.膀胱过度活动症和压力性尿失禁女性的性功能障碍与对照组比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021 Sep;81(9):1039-1046. doi: 10.1055/a-1499-8392. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Prevalence and trends in urinary incontinence among women in the United States, 2005-2018.美国女性尿失禁的患病率和趋势,2005-2018 年。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):166.e1-166.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.016. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
4
The Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Metropolitan City of Naples.尿失禁对生活质量的影响:那不勒斯大都会市的一项横断面研究。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;5(4):96. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040096.
5
Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.女性压力性尿失禁的手术干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 5;365:l1842. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1842.
6
Overactive bladder symptoms after midurethral sling surgery in women: Risk factors and management.女性经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带手术后膀胱过度活动症症状:危险因素与处理
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):83-88. doi: 10.1002/nau.23328. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
7
Vaginal prolapse repair with or without a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence: a randomized trial.伴有隐匿性压力性尿失禁的生殖器脱垂女性行阴道脱垂修复术加或不加尿道中段吊带术:一项随机试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1029-38. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2924-1. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
Postmenopausal overactive bladder.绝经后膀胱过度活动症
Prz Menopauzalny. 2014 Dec;13(6):313-29. doi: 10.5114/pm.2014.47984. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a randomised trial.经阴道脱垂修复术联合或不联合中段尿道吊带在伴有生殖道脱垂和压力性尿失禁女性中的应用:一项随机试验。
BJOG. 2015 Jun;122(7):1022-30. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13325. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life among Iranian Women.尿失禁对伊朗女性生活质量的影响。
J Family Reprod Health. 2014 Mar;8(1):13-9.