Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Aug 20;44(9):909-914. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae040.
The Vectra XT 3D simulation program is a valuable tool for implant selection during the decision-making process regarding breast augmentation. The software allows for the assignment of automatically or manually positioned anatomical landmarks and provides accompanying measurements.
This study aimed to present a strategy for standardizing landmark placement on Vectra images during primary breast augmentations, optimizing implant selection and ensuring consistency in breast width data collection.
The author performed a retrospective analysis of patient data in which breast width measurements were obtained through clinical assessment (CA) and the Vectra program with both automatically (VA) and manually (VM) placed landmarks. Consideration was also given to the thickness of medial and lateral breast tissues. The suggested implant base width from all groups was then compared to the actual implant placed during the surgical procedure.
Comparing the change rates with the actual implant width revealed that rates in CA measurements were significantly lower than those in VA (P < .05), and similarly lower than those in VM (P < .05). Furthermore, change rates in VM were significantly lower than in VA (P < .05). Each group showed a significant positive correlation with the actual implant width.
The Vectra XT 3D simulation program is a valuable adjunct in breast augmentation. However, relying on it solely may lead to inaccuracies in the assessment of breast dimensions due to automatic landmarking. To achieve standardized measurements, landmarks can be marked on the patient before creating the Vectra image. Our results underline the superiority of clinical judgment to simulation programs when establishing a reliable surgical plan.
Vectra XT 3D 模拟程序是乳房隆乳决策过程中选择植入物的有价值工具。该软件允许自动或手动定位解剖学标志,并提供相关测量。
本研究旨在提出一种在原发性乳房增大过程中标准化 Vectra 图像上标志位置的策略,优化植入物选择并确保在收集乳房宽度数据时保持一致性。
作者对患者数据进行了回顾性分析,其中通过临床评估(CA)和 Vectra 程序(自动 VA 和手动 VM 放置标志)获得乳房宽度测量值。还考虑了内侧和外侧乳房组织的厚度。然后将所有组别的建议植入物基底宽度与手术过程中实际放置的植入物进行比较。
与实际植入物宽度的变化率相比,CA 测量的变化率明显低于 VA(P<.05),并且也低于 VM(P<.05)。此外,VM 的变化率明显低于 VA(P<.05)。每组与实际植入物宽度均呈显著正相关。
Vectra XT 3D 模拟程序是乳房增大的有价值的辅助工具。然而,仅依赖它可能会由于自动标记导致对乳房尺寸的评估不准确。为了实现标准化测量,可以在创建 Vectra 图像之前在患者身上标记标志。我们的结果强调了在制定可靠的手术计划时,临床判断优于模拟程序。