Suppr超能文献

主观验光与客观验光在健康年轻成年人中的比较。

Subjective versus objective refraction in healthy young adults.

机构信息

Department of Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

The Israeli Air Force Aeromedical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03340-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate objective and subjective refraction differences in healthy young adults.

METHODS

Data concerning candidates for the Israeli Air Force Flight Academy, as well as active air force pilots in all stages of service who underwent a routine health checkup between the years 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Objective refraction measured using a single autorefractometer was compared with subjective refraction measured by an experienced military optometrist during the same visit. The results were converted to power vectors (spherical equivalent [SE], J0, and J45). To interpret astigmatism using power vector values, the cylinder power (Cp) was determined.

RESULTS

This study included 1,395 young adult participants. The average age was 22.17 years (range, 17-39, 84.8% males). The average SE was - 0.65 ± 1.19 diopter (D) compared with - 0.71 ± 0.91D in the auto- and subjective refraction, respectively (p = 0.001). Cp was 0.91 ± 0.52D and 0.67 ± 0.40D, respectively (p < 0.001). This difference was more common in older participants (p < 0.001). J0 and J45 value differences were not significant. The absolute SE value of subjective refraction was lower in the myopic (p < 0.001) and hyperopic (p < 0.001) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Young hyperopic participants tended to prefer "less plus" in subjective refraction compared with autorefraction. Young myopic participants tended to prefer "less minus" in subjective refraction compared with autorefraction. All participants, but mainly older participants, preferred slightly "less Cp" than that measured using autorefraction; The astigmatic axis did not differ significantly between the methods.

摘要

目的

评估健康年轻成年人客观和主观折射差异。

方法

回顾性分析了 2018 年至 2019 年期间接受例行健康检查的以色列空军飞行学院候选人和所有服役阶段的现役空军飞行员的数据。使用自动折射仪测量的客观折射与在同一就诊期间由经验丰富的军事验光师测量的主观折射进行比较。结果转换为功率向量(等效球镜[SE]、J0 和 J45)。为了使用功率向量值解释散光,确定了圆柱镜力(Cp)。

结果

这项研究包括 1395 名年轻成年参与者。平均年龄为 22.17 岁(范围 17-39 岁,84.8%为男性)。平均 SE 为-0.65±1.19 屈光度(D),而自动和主观折射分别为-0.71±0.91D(p=0.001)。Cp 分别为 0.91±0.52D 和 0.67±0.40D(p<0.001)。这种差异在年龄较大的参与者中更为常见(p<0.001)。J0 和 J45 值差异无统计学意义。主观折射的 SE 值绝对值在近视(p<0.001)和远视(p<0.001)患者中较低。

结论

年轻远视患者在主观折射中倾向于比自动折射更喜欢“少加”。年轻近视患者在主观折射中倾向于比自动折射更喜欢“少减”。所有参与者,但主要是年龄较大的参与者,更喜欢比自动折射略低的“略低 Cp”;散光轴在两种方法之间无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Subjective versus objective refraction in healthy young adults.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03340-w.
2
Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;102(12):1717-1722. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311594. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Comparison of the Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Using OPDIII and Subjective Findings in Visually Normal Subjects.
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S302-S306. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000472.
5
Noncycloplegic Compared with Cycloplegic Refraction in a Chicago School-Aged Population.
Ophthalmology. 2022 Jul;129(7):813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):632-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000566.
7
The Refractive Error of Professional Baseball Players.
Optom Vis Sci. 2017 May;94(5):564-573. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001067.
8
Laser in situ keratomileusis for high astigmatism in myopic and hyperopic eyes.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.054. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
10
A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 22;9(7):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.23. eCollection 2020 Jun.

引用本文的文献

2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on manifest refraction in a young adult population: A large cohort study.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06862-1.
3
Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in high astigmatism.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 18;18(3):504-509. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.03.18. eCollection 2025.
4
Determination of the time of refractive stability after uneventful phacoemulsification in Indian eyes.
World J Exp Med. 2024 Jun 20;14(2):95016. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.95016.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of refractive state and heterophorias on visual acuity and stereoacuity in healthy young adults.
J AAPOS. 2022 Aug;26(4):181.e1-181.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
J Optom. 2022 Jan-Mar;15(1):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Aug 3;7(4):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.4.11. eCollection 2018 Jul.
7
Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for epidemiological studies.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;93(6):581-5. doi: 10.1111/aos.12642. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
9
Clinical applications of power vectors.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;86(6):599-602. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a211.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验