Liblik Sergio Alexandre, Rocha da Cunha Thiago, Liblik Carmem Silvia da Fonseca Kummer, Biscioni Diego Nicolás, Girardi Dennys Robson
Magíster en Bioética. Profesor, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brasil.
Doctor en Bioética. Profesor, Programa de Pós-grado em Bioética, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brasil.
Salud Colect. 2024 Feb 14;20:e4630. doi: 10.18294/sc.2024.4630.
This essay, situated in the field of bioethics, examines the prohibition of psychedelic use, exploring arguments surrounding the growing evidence of their therapeutic potential and their millennia-long history of cultural and spiritual uses. It initially discusses the historical context of psychedelics and the various terms used to describe them. The essay problematizes the definition of "drugs," highlighting the lack of objective criteria for distinguishing between legal and illicit substances. Drawing on concepts and theoretical frameworks of critical bioethics, it analyzes how the prohibitionist moral discourse is sustained more by political and economic interests than by scientific justifications, leading to stigmatization and vulnerability. The essay advocates for the end of the prohibition of psychedelics based on ethical arguments, emphasizing their importance in reducing individual and collective suffering. The work contributes to a deeper reflection on this socially controversial topic, integrating interdisciplinary knowledge.
本文立足于生物伦理学领域,审视了对迷幻剂使用的禁令,探讨了围绕其治疗潜力的越来越多证据以及它们长达数千年的文化和精神用途历史的相关论点。它首先讨论了迷幻剂的历史背景以及用于描述它们的各种术语。本文对“毒品”的定义提出质疑,强调缺乏区分合法与非法物质的客观标准。借鉴批判性生物伦理学的概念和理论框架,它分析了禁止主义道德话语如何更多地由政治和经济利益而非科学依据所维系,从而导致污名化和易受伤害性。本文基于伦理论据主张结束对迷幻剂的禁令,强调它们在减轻个人和集体痛苦方面的重要性。这项工作通过整合跨学科知识,有助于对这个社会争议性话题进行更深入的思考。