Suppr超能文献

迷幻剂作为道德生物增强剂:关于支持与反对的伦理论证的范围综述方案

Psychedelics as moral bioenhancers: Protocol for a scoping review of ethical arguments for and against.

作者信息

Streicher Samuel, Register Christopher, Lim Xiu, Barış Maide, Porsdam Mann Sebastian, Cheung Katherine, Gordon Emma C, Yaden David, Savulescu Julian, Earp Brian D

机构信息

University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

University of Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Jan 13;10:3. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23414.1. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Moral bioenhancement typically refers to the deliberate use of drugs or biotechnologies, potentially alongside other practices, to attempt to improve oneself morally. In addition to general concerns regarding moral self-bioenhancement, the possibility of using psychedelic substances for such purposes raises distinct ethical questions. As a first step in analysing these questions, we intend to perform a scoping review of the existing arguments for and against the use of psychedelics as moral bioenhancers. We will focus primarily on voluntary use by individuals, although voluntary use by couples or small groups will be considered. The present contribution is a protocol for this scoping review.

METHODS

Our scoping review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, which involves five stages: (1) identifying the research question, (2) developing the search strategy, (3) setting inclusion criteria, (4) extracting data, and (5) presenting and analysing the results. We will include both published and unpublished sources if they explicitly present ethical arguments for or against the voluntary use of psychedelics as intentional moral bioenhancers in adults. We will search for relevant studies in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, The National Library of Medicine, the Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Philosopher's Index, the Bioethics Literature Database, EthxWeb, PhilPapers, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosopher's Index, EBSCO, BASE, and WorldCat. Sources will be excluded if (a) the full text is inaccessible, (b) the main text is in a language other than English, or (c) the focus is not primarily on ethical arguments (for example, focusing primarily on the clinical use of psychedelics for treatment). Two raters will independently assess all articles for eligibility, with disagreements to be resolved with a third reviewer. Data from eligible articles will be charted using a standardised data extraction form. The data will be analysed following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

摘要

背景

道德生物增强通常指有意使用药物或生物技术,可能还包括其他方法,来尝试在道德层面提升自我。除了对道德自我生物增强的普遍担忧外,将致幻物质用于此目的的可能性引发了独特的伦理问题。作为分析这些问题的第一步,我们打算对支持和反对将致幻剂用作道德生物增强剂的现有论据进行一项范围综述。我们将主要关注个人的自愿使用,不过也会考虑夫妻或小群体的自愿使用。本文献是这项范围综述的方案。

方法

我们的范围综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法,该方法包括五个阶段:(1)确定研究问题,(2)制定检索策略,(3)设定纳入标准,(4)提取数据,以及(5)呈现和分析结果。如果已发表和未发表的资料明确提出支持或反对成年人自愿将致幻剂用作有意的道德生物增强剂的伦理论据,我们将把它们纳入。我们将在Embase、MEDLINE、科学网、谷歌学术、美国国立医学图书馆、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、哲学家索引、生物伦理文献数据库、EthxWeb、PhilPapers、斯坦福哲学百科全书、哲学家索引、EBSCO、BASE和WorldCat中搜索相关研究。如果资料存在以下情况将被排除:(a)无法获取全文,(b)正文语言不是英语,或(c)重点不是主要关于伦理论据(例如,主要关注致幻剂用于治疗的临床应用)。两名评估人员将独立评估所有文章的 eligibility,如有分歧将由第三名评审员解决。符合条件的文章的数据将使用标准化的数据提取表进行记录。数据将按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行分析。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Psilocybin: The most effective moral bio-enhancer?裸盖菇素:最有效的道德生物增强剂?
Bioethics. 2023 Sep;37(7):683-689. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13196. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
8
Psychedelic Drug Legislative Reform and Legalization in the US.美国迷幻药立法改革与合法化。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 1;80(1):77-83. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.4101.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验